Mishnah
Mishnah

Commento su Nedarim 2:3

יֵשׁ נֶדֶר בְּתוֹךְ נֶדֶר, וְאֵין שְׁבוּעָה בְּתוֹךְ שְׁבוּעָה. כֵּיצַד, אָמַר הֲרֵינִי נָזִיר אִם אֹכַל, הֲרֵינִי נָזִיר אִם אֹכַל, וְאָכַל, חַיָּב עַל כָּל אַחַת וְאֶחָת. שְׁבוּעָה שֶׁלֹּא אֹכַל, שְׁבוּעָה שֶׁלֹּא אֹכַל, וְאָכַל, אֵינוֹ חַיָּב אֶלָּא אֶחָת:

C'è un voto all'interno di un voto, ma non c'è giuramento all'interno di un giuramento. Come mai? Se dicesse: "Sarò un nazirita se mangio; sarò un nazirita se mangio", è responsabile di ogni voto. (Se dicesse :) "Giuro che non mangerò; giuro che non mangerò", e mangiò, è responsabile solo per uno. [Diventa un nazirita per trenta giorni se dicesse: "Sarò un nazirita", non qualificato. E porta l'offerta nazirita, e diventa di nuovo un nazirita in base al numero di volte che ha giurato. E con un giuramento, è responsabile solo per uno, ricevendo strisce solo una volta. Ma se ottiene l'assoluzione per il primo giuramento, il secondo vale. E, analogamente, se ottiene l'assoluzione per il secondo giuramento, il terzo è valido; e non gli è permesso di mangiare fino a quando non è assolto da tutto. Perché non abbiamo imparato: "È un giuramento", ma: "È responsabile solo per uno."]

Bartenura on Mishnah Nedarim

חייב על כל אחת ואחת – and he will a Nazir for thirty days if he said, I am an undefined Nazir, nad he will bring the Nazirite sacrifice and return to be a Nazir according to the number of times that he said, “I will be a Nazir.” But regarding an oath, he is not liable other than for one [sacrifice,” for he is not flogged/whipped other than one set of stripes. But if he made a request to be released on the first oath, the second oath takes effect. And similarly, if he made a request to be released on the second [oath], the third takes effect. But he is is forbidden to eat until he all of them are not binding, because it does not teach in the Mishnah, “behold this is one oath,” but rather, “he is only liable for one count only.”
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Nedarim

Introduction This mishnah continues to draw distinctions between vows and oaths.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Nedarim

There is a vow within a vow, but not an oath within an oath. This section teaches that there is an additional stringency in vows that does not exist for oaths. One can make two vows on the same thing but not two oaths. The mishnah will now explain how this can happen.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Nedarim

How is this so? If one declares, “Behold, I will be a nazir if I eat [this thing]”; “Behold, I will be a nazir if I eat [this thing]” and then he eats [it], he is liable for each and every one. “I swear that I will not eat [this thing]”, “I swear that I will not eat [this thing]” and then he eats [it], he is only liable for one oath. If a person said twice that he will be a nazir if he eats a certain thing, and then he eats that thing, he must be a nazir twice. Since an unspecified nazirite period is thirty days (we will learn more about this in the next tractate), this person must act as a nazir for sixty days. However, if he takes two oaths that he will not eat a certain thing, and then eats it, he is only liable for breaking one oath. If he breaks the oath intentionally he only receives one set of lashes, and if accidentally, he only brings one sacrifice.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Versetto precedenteCapitolo completoVersetto successivo