Chi separa il denaro per i suoi sacrifici di nazir , non può trarne beneficio e non è soggetto a meilah perché [i soldi] sono adatti per essere usati come shelamim. Se [nazir] è morto e il denaro non è stato specificato [per il quale l'offerta deve essere utilizzata], dovrebbero essere utilizzati per le offerte volontarie. Se sono specificati per quale sacrificio dovrebbero essere usati, i soldi per il chatat dovrebbero essere gettati nel Mar Morto, non si può trarne beneficio e non sono soggetti a meilah . Il denaro per l' olah dovrebbe essere usato per portare un olah ed è soggetto a meilah . I soldi per lo shelamim dovrebbero essere usati per acquistare uno shelamim e possono essere consumati per un giorno ma non richiedono il pane di accompagnamento [dell'offerta nazireo].
Bartenura on Mishnah Meilah
המפריש מעות לנזירותו – but he didn’t specify, “these for my burnt-offering (he-lamb), and these for my sin-offering (ewe-lamb) and these for my peace-offering (ram).” (see Numbers 6:14)
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Meilah
Introduction
When a nazirite finishes his term he must bring three offerings: a hatat (sin-offering), an olah (whole-burnt offering), and a shelamim (well-being offering). Our mishnah deals with how the law of sacrilege and various other laws apply to these three offerings in a case where a person set aside money to buy the sacrifices but had not yet bought them.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Meilah
לא נהנים ולא מועלים – with all of these monies.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Meilah
If one has set aside money for his nazirite offerings, it may not be used, but the law of sacrilege does not apply to it, as it may all be used for the shelamim. If he set aside money, he is not allowed to use the money, but the laws of sacrilege don’t apply. This is because all of the money might end up going for shelamim (offerings of well-being), and since shelamim are sacrifices of lower sanctity, the laws of sacrilege do not apply to them (see 1:4).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Meilah
מפני שהן ראויין להביא אותן שלמים – that is to say, that for each and every Me’ah (a small silver coin worth 32 Perutot or one-sixth of a Denar), we are able to say that he set them aside for peace-offerings. But peace-offerings are Lesser Holy Things and they don’t have the law of religious sacrilege associated with them, as is taught at the end of the first chapter [of Meilah, Mishnah 4], for Lesser Holy Things prior to the sprinkling/tossing of the blood, one does not commit sacrilege. But even though there is also among them the sin-offering and burnt-offering which are eligible for religious sacrilege, since there are also the monies for the peace-offerings which are not eligible for religious sacrilege, if he brought upon them the sacrilege sacrifice, we find that he brings unconsecrated things into the Temple courtyard, therefore, they are not available for benefit nor religious sacrilege.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Meilah
If he died and left money [for his nazirite offerings] If unspecified it shall go to the fund for voluntary offerings; If specified: The money designated for the hatats shall be taken to the Dead Sea; it may not be used, though the law of sacrilege does not apply to it. With the money designated for an olah they shall bring a olah; the law of sacrilege applies to it. With the money designated for the shelamim they shall bring a shelamim, and it has to be consumed within a day, but requires no bread offering. If he died and left money, but had not specified how much was to go for each type of sacrifice, then all of the money goes to the general fund in the Temple used to buy voluntary offerings.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Meilah
מת – A person who sets aside money, and these monies were undefined, as he did not specify that these were for the sin-offering and these for the burnt-offering and these for the peace-offering, all these monies would all [to the Temple treasury] as a donation.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Meilah
The mishnah now deals with a case where he did specify which coins go for which sacrifices. The money set aside for a hatat must be destroyed. As we learned in yesterday’s mishnah, a hatat whose owners have died can’t be sacrificed. While it is forbidden to derive any benefit from this money, if he does it is not sacrilege, because the money was not going to be used to buy a sacrifice. The money for the olah should be used to buy an olah. The law of sacrilege will apply to the olah, as it always does. The money set aside for the shelamim is used for a shelamim. It must be eaten by the next day, as is the law for the shelamim of a nazirite (Zevahim 5:6), but it does not need to be accompanied by a bread-offering, because the nazirite is dead and the bread offering is supposed to be put in his hands (see Numbers 6:19).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Meilah
דמי חטאת ילכו לים המלח – for a sin-offering whose owners died.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Meilah
דמי עולה יביאו עולה – as we state [Tractate Kinim, at the end of Chapter 2 – Mishnah 5]: “The woman who died let her heirs bring her bunt-offering,” for it is a mere gift.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Meilah
ונאכלין ליום אחד – like the law regarding the peace-offering of the Nazir (see Mishnah Zevakhim, Chapter 5, Mishnah 6 - also found in a standard traditional Siddur as part of the morning service).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Meilah
ואינן טעונין לחם – for regarding bread, it is written (Numbers 6:19): ”and he shall place them (the shoulder of the ram, one unleavened cake and one unleavened wafer) and place them on he hands of the nazirite [after he has shaved his consecrated hair],” but he is not there since he died.