E questi sono quelli che ricevono le strisce [Non solo "questi". Perché il tanna insegna (questi) e omette molti che ricevono strisce. Ma ci insegna coloro che sono in grado di Kareth di informarci che le strisce ottengono con coloro che sono in grado di Kareth. E ci insegna a una vedova-divorziata a informarci che esiste una responsabilità a strisce in quel caso a causa di due esortazioni. E ci insegna tevel e la prima decima il cui teruma non era separato, perché la loro esortazione non è esplicitamente dichiarata. Allo stesso modo, hekdesh (cibo dedicato) che non è stato riscattato. E dal momento che insegna hekdesh, insegna seconda decima, strisce ottenibili con entrambi a causa della non redenzione. Allo stesso modo, con tutto, c'è qualche novità (di cui siamo istruiti)]: uno che vive con sua sorella, con la sorella di suo padre, con la sorella di sua madre, con la sorella di sua moglie, con la moglie di suo fratello, con la moglie di il fratello di suo padre, con una niddah (una donna nel suo stato mestruale), un sommo sacerdote che vive con una vedova, un sacerdote regolare che vive con un divorzio o con una chalutzah, un israelita che vive con un mamzereth (il problema di relazioni illecite) o con una Nethinah [una discendente dei Giveoniti, (una relazione) soggetta a strisce a causa di (Deuteronomio 7: 3): "Non sposarti con loro".], e una donna israelita che vive con una Nathin o un mamzer. (Un sommo sacerdote che vive con) una vedova divorziata che era stata vedova da un altro uomo] è soggetta a strisce a causa di due esortazioni, entrambe (divorzia e vedova) indicate nella Scrittura, ed entrambe esortate contro.] ( Un Cohein che vive con) una divorcée-chalutzah [cioè una chalutzah che era stata divorziata] è soggetta a strisce a causa di una sola esortazione. [Non è responsabile a causa di due esortazioni, poiché Chalutzah non è esplicitamente dichiarato, ma derivato dall'aggiunta ("e"), vale a dire. (Levitico 21: 7): "Una donna divorziata"—Questo mi dice solo di un divorzio. Quando ricavo una chalutzah (come similmente interdetta)? Da: "e una donna ha divorziato."]
Bartenura on Mishnah Makkot
אלו הן הלוקין – not exactly these, for the Mishnah taught and left out many of those who were to be flogged, but since the Mishnah taught those who were liable for extirpation, to teach us that there is flogging with those liable for extirpation, and the Mishnah taught a widow and a divorcee, to teach us that a widow who is also a divorcee is liable upon her two titles. , And it is taught [in Mishnah 2 of this chapter] that eatables forbidden pending the separation of sacred gifts and First Tithe when priest’s due had not been taken, but it doesn’t explain their explicit prohibition clearly, and similarly, property dedicated to the Temple that had not been redeemed, for since the Mishnah taught about property dedicated to the Temple, it taught [about] the Second Tithe, for both of them [are punishable] by flogging because of lack of redemption, and similarly with most of them there is a side that is novel.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Makkot
Introduction
The final chapter of Makkoth discussed those who are liable to be flogged. There are three reasons that a person is flogged: 1) one who transgresses a Biblical law for which the penalty is kareth (heavenly excommunication). According to the Rabbis one who was flogged is not penalized by kareth, considered to be a more serious punishment. 2) One who transgresses a Biblical law which is punishable by death by the hands of Heaven. 3) One who transgresses a Biblical negative commandment, provided the transgression was active. Our chapter lists many categories of those who are to flogged but the list is not exhaustive.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Makkot
נתינה – She is from the Gibeonites, and her flogging is from (Deuteronomy 7:3): “You shall not intermarry with them.”
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Makkot
And these are liable to be flogged: One who had relations with his sister, or his father's sister, or his mother's sister, or his wife's sister, or his brother's wife, or his father's brother's wife, or a menstruant; This mishnah lists sexual offenses which are not punishable by death. In each of these cases both offenders, the man and the woman will be flogged. These forbidden relations are discussed in Leviticus chapters eighteen and twenty.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Makkot
אלמנה – She became widowed from another man, and she is a divorcee, and one is liable upon her two [sets] of floggings.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Makkot
A high priest who marries a widow, an ordinary priest who marries a divorcee or a halutzah; This section lists marriages forbidden to high priests and ordinary priests. They are listed in Leviticus 21:7, 13-15.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Makkot
משום שני שמות – because of two explicit prohibitions, for both of them are explained in Scripture, and the explicit prohibitions for both of them are stated.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Makkot
An Israelite who marries a mamzereth or natinah, or an Israelite woman who is married to a mamzer or a natin. This section lists marriages forbidden to ordinary Israelites. A mamzer or mamzereth (a female mamzer), mentioned in Deuteronomy 23:3, is one born of a forbidden union which carries with it a punishment of kareth or death. A natin or natina (a female natin) is a descendent of the Gibeonites, those who tricked Joshua into accepting them as converts, upon which he declared them to be woodchoppers and water-drawers and forbade them to marry ordinary Israelites (Joshua 9:27).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Makkot
גרושה – and she is a woman released from leviratical marriage, and he is not liable concerning her for two titles, for the woman released from leviratical marriage has no Jewish marriage contract, other than through extension of scope/amplification [of the Biblical passage] we bring it to her, as it is taught in a Baraita: “I don’t know anything about a divorcee other than the divorcee itself; a woman released from leviratical marriage, from where do I know it, as we learn, “and a woman” (Leviticus 18:18).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Makkot
In the case of a [woman who is both] a divorcee and a widow [a high priest] is liable on two counts. But in the case of a [woman who is both] a divorcee and a halutzah, an ordinary priest is liable only on one count. A widow who is also a divorcee, i.e. her first husband died and her second husband divorced her, is forbidden to a high priest on two counts. If he were to marry such a woman he would be obligated to be flogged for each transgression, even though he did only one act. A divorcee and a halutzah (one who has been rejected by her levir, her dead husband’s brother) are forbidden to an ordinary priest. However, the prohibition of the halutzah to an ordinary priest is only a Rabbinic prohibition, not Biblical, as is the prohibition to a divorcee Therefore, an ordinary priest who marries a divorcee who is also a halutzah is only flogged for one transgression.
