Se c'erano sacrifici per il peccato [uccelli] su un lato e olocausto [uccelli] su un altro lato e [una] [coppia] non specificata nel mezzo, e poi dalla metà [coppia] un uccello volava su un lato e uno uccello all'altro, lui [il padrone] non ha perso nulla, piuttosto dovrebbe dire, l'unico [uccello] che è volato all'offerta per il peccato dovrebbe essere un sacrificio per il peccato e l'unico [uccello] che è volato all'olocausto dovrebbe essere un olocausto. Se poi sono tornati nel mezzo, gli uccelli nel mezzo devono essere lasciati morire, e questi [gli uccelli che offrono il peccato] devono essere portati come sacrifici per il peccato e questi [gli uccelli che offrono l'olocausto] devono essere portati come bruciati -offerings. Se ancora una volta [un uccello] volava dal centro [indietro] ai lati, tutti devono essere lasciati morire. Non si possono portare tortore abbinate a piccioni o piccioni abbinati a tortore. Come mai? Una donna che ha portato come sacrificio per il peccato una tortora e come olocausto un piccione, deve farcela e portare come olocausto una tortora. Se ha portato come olocausto una tortora e come suo sacrificio offre un piccione, deve farlo e portare a olocausto un piccione. Ben Azzai ha detto che seguiamo qualunque uccello venga offerto per primo. Una donna che ha portato il suo sacrificio per il peccato ed è morta, i suoi eredi devono portare il suo olocausto. [Se ha portato] il suo olocausto e è morta, i suoi eredi non devono portare il suo sacrificio per il peccato.
Bartenura on Mishnah Kinnim
חטאת מכאן – an individual pigeon that was designated/specified for a sin-offering to one side, and an individual pigeon that was designated/specified for a burnt-offering to the second side, and two individual pigeons of an undesignated/unspecified nature (i.e., either for a sin-offering or for a burnt-offering) in the center.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Kinnim
Hatat [birds] are on one side, and olot [birds] are on the other and an unassigned [pair] is in the middle: If from the middle pair one bird flew to this side, and one bird flew to this side, then he has not lost anything, because he [the priest] says that the bird that flew [from the middle] towards the hataot is a hatat and the bird that flew towards the olot is a burnt-offering. If one [from each side] returns to the middle, then [all] those in the middle must be left to die, but those [left on either side] can be offered up as hataot or as olot respectively. If again a bird [from the middle] returned and flew away to the sides, then all must be left to die. This section discusses a case where a person has three groups of birds. On one side are a group of birds designated to be hataot. On the other side are a group of birds designated to be olot. In between the two groups is an unassigned pair of birds, one in which it has not yet been determined which will be a hatat and which will be an olah. The mishnah describes three scenarios. A) If one of the unassigned birds flies to each of the other groups, there is no problem, because these birds can be either a hatat or an olah. B) If one of the birds from the hataot and one of the birds from the olot flies back to the middle, then they must be left to die because we don't know which one is a hatat and which is an olah. The birds left on the side remain hataot and olot. C) If the middle birds now fly back one to each side and become mixed up with the birds there, then the ones on the side must die as well because we don't know which are hataot and which are olot.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Kinnim
פרח מן האמצע – one individual pigeon to the right and one individual pigeon to the left.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Kinnim
One cannot pair turtle-doves with pigeons or pigeons with turtle-doves. How is this so? If a woman has brought a turtle-dove as her hatat and a pigeon as her olah, she must then bring another turtle-dove as her burnt-offering; If her olah had been a turtle-dove and her hatat a pigeon, then she must bring another pigeon as her olah. Ben Azzai says: we go after the first [offering]. When a woman brings a pair of birds for sacrifices she must either bring two turtle-doves (and a partridge in a pear tree) or two pigeons. She cannot bring one of each type of bird. According to the first opinion, the hatat is the bird that determines what the other bird must be. So if the hatat is a turtle-dove, she must bring a turtle-dove as an olah, and if the hatat is a pigeon, she must bring a pigeon as an olah. The order in which the birds are brought does not matter. Ben Azzai says that the first bird that she brings determines what the second bird is. Therefore if she first brings a turtle-dove as an olah, and then tries to bring a pigeon as a hatat, she must bring a turtle-dove as an olah.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Kinnim
לא הפסיד כלום – that the one that is combined with the sin-offerings will be made for a sin-offering, and the one that is with the burnt-offerings will be made a burnt-offering, but not for a sin-offering, for perhaps he (i.e., the Kohen) will make it from the designated/specified [ones] for a burnt-offering.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Kinnim
If a woman brought her hatat and then died, her heirs must bring her olah; [But if she first brought] her olah and then died, her heirs need not bring her hatat. If a woman sets aside birds as sacrifices and then dies, her heirs can offer the olah but they cannot offer the hatat, because a hatat whose owners have died must be left to die. This is the standard rule with regard to the hatat (see Temurah 2:2).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Kinnim
חזר לאמצע – they (i.e., the pigeons) returned from the sides, one from here and the other from there and combined together, they are left to die, for they are a [designated] sin-offering and a [designated] burnt-offering that were combined/mixed together. But those which remained, each one alone, each are offered according to their respective law.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Kinnim
חזר מן האמצעיים לצדדין – those [designated] for sin-offerings and/or burnt-offerings are combined/mixed, and all are left to die.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Kinnim
אין מביאים תורים כנגד בני יונה – but rather either both of them are turtle-doves or both of them are pigeons.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Kinnim
תכפול ותביא עולתה בן יונה – as according to the law for the sin-offering. For the sin-offering is the essence/main object, whether he (i.e., the Kohen) set it aside first or whether he set it aside at the end.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Kinnim
הולכין אחר הראשון – but she does not bring the second, but rather from the species that she set aside/designated first, whether it was a sin-offering first or whether it was a bunt-offering. And the Halakha is according to the first Tanna/teacher (i.e., that both the sin-offering and burnt-offering shojld come from the same species).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Kinnim
לא יביאו היורשים חטאתה – for it is a sin-offering where its owners had died. But if it is not for this reason, we bring a sin-offering even though she offered a burnt-offering first. But even thought that in every case/place the sin-offering precedes the burnt-offering, this is especially for the Mitzvah, but not to be indispensable/to invalidate an act by omission.
