Talmud sur Téroumot 4:3

שִׁעוּר תְּרוּמָה, עַיִן יָפָה, אֶחָד מֵאַרְבָּעִים. בֵּית שַׁמַּאי אוֹמְרִים, מִשְּׁלֹשִׁים. וְהַבֵּינוֹנִית, מֵחֲמִשִּׁים. וְהָרָעָה, מִשִּׁשִּׁים. תָּרַם וְעָלָה בְיָדוֹ אֶחָד מִשִּׁשִּׁים, תְּרוּמָה, וְאֵינוֹ צָרִיךְ לִתְרֹם. חָזַר וְהוֹסִיף, חַיָּב בְּמַעַשְׂרוֹת. עָלָה בְיָדוֹ מִשִּׁשִּׁים וְאֶחָד, תְּרוּמָה, וְיַחֲזֹר וְיִתְרֹם כְּמוֹת שֶׁהוּא לָמוּד, בְּמִדָּה וּבְמִשְׁקָל וּבְמִנְיָן. רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר, אַף שֶׁלֹּא מִן הַמֻּקָּף:

Le montant de Terumah : Un [montant généreux] aux yeux clairs : un sur quarante. Beit Shammai dit: sur trente. La moyenne [montant]: sur cinquante. Un [montant] radin: sur soixante. S'il a mis de côté Terumah et a constaté que c'était seulement un sur soixante, [c'est valable] Terumah et il n'a pas besoin de mettre de côté [plus] Terumah . S'il revient en arrière et ajoute [plus de Terumah ], [le montant supplémentaire] nécessite la dîme. S'il découvrait que c'était seulement un Terumah sur soixante-cinq [c'est valable] , mais il doit à nouveau mettre de côté Terumah selon sa pratique habituelle, en mesure, en poids ou en nombre. Le rabbin Yehudah dit: [il peut] même [mettre de côté Terumah ] pas du [produit] environnant.

Jerusalem Talmud Demai

HALAKHAH: Rebbi Eleazar⁵¹The paragraph does not belong here but in Terumot 2:4, where the text is identical except for בטילה instead of בטיבולה. The Mishnah in Terumot assumes that somebody gives a seah to a Levite and a seah to the poor; according to R. Meïr then he, or his worker, can eat eight seah based on the tithes he gave. The Sages permit only to eat according to the percentage of the tithe that still exists. Maimonides and R. Simson give two possible interpretations, one that the Mishnah there is a corollary to the Mishnah here and deals with a worker who receives food from his employer and sees the employer give to the Levite and the poor but does not know whether he gave as tithes or as gifts. R. Hoshaiah declares that the position of the Sages in that Mishnah is identical with the position of the Tanna in our Mishnah. in the name of Rebbi Hoshaiah: They considered him a worker who does not trust his employer. The following is obvious: If the produce was burned, the heave is ṭevel⁵²Since heave is taken to permit the rest to be eaten, if nothing can be eaten there is no heave, and heave and tithes have to be separated anew from the remainder. This refers to the case where the produce burned before the heave was delivered to the Cohen. If the heave burned after he declared it, the farmer did his duty.. If the heave is burned, when the produce is eaten the heave will have been sanctified retroactively.

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Verset précédent Chapitre complet Verset suivant