Mishnah
Mishnah

Talmud sur Téroumot 3:4

בַּמֶּה דְבָרִים אֲמוּרִים, בְּשֶׁלֹּא דִבֵּר, אֲבָל הִרְשָׁה אֶת בֶּן בֵּיתוֹ אוֹ אֶת עַבְדּוֹ אוֹ אֶת שִׁפְחָתוֹ לִתְרֹם, תְּרוּמָתוֹ תְרוּמָה. בִּטֵּל, אִם עַד שֶׁלֹּא תָרַם בִּטֵּל, אֵין תְּרוּמָתוֹ תְרוּמָה. וְאִם מִשֶּׁתָּרַם בִּטֵּל, תְּרוּמָתוֹ תְרוּמָה. הַפּוֹעֲלִים, אֵין לָהֶן רְשׁוּת לִתְרֹם, חוּץ מִן הַדָּרוֹכוֹת, שֶׁהֵן מְטַמְּאִים אֶת הַגַּת מִיָּד:

À quoi cela s'applique-t-il? Seulement si l'un ne s'est pas entretenu [avec l'autre], mais si l'on permet à un membre de sa maisonnée, ou à son esclave mâle ou esclave de mettre de côté Terumah [pour lui], cette Terumah est [considérée comme valide] Terumah . S'il a annulé [cette permission]: S'il l'a annulée avant de mettre de côté Terumah , la Terumah n'est pas [valide] Terumah . Mais s'il l'a annulée après avoir mis de côté Terumah , la Terumah est Terumah . Les ouvriers n'ont pas la permission de donner Terumah , sauf pour ceux qui foulent [les raisins] car ils rendent immédiatement le pressoir impur.

Jerusalem Talmud Gittin

HALAKHAH: “In earlier times, he could go to court,” etc. Does this15This question is based on the interpretation of the term “court” in the Mishnah as an ad hoc court, that the husband was able ad hoc to assemble three people as a court, and declare before them that he was revoking the agency given to the agent. This is the explanation accepted in the Babli in the name of Rav Naḥman, 32b. not disagree with Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish, since Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish said that nobody can annul an agency by speech2,If a person can declare the agency void by a declaration at his place without informing the agent, why does the Mishnah accept voiding the agency only if either the agent for delivery or the recipient of the bill is informed of the annulment? R. Joḥanan’s statement is also in Qiddušin 4:9; in the parallel in the Babli, Qiddušin 59a, his reason is that words can be invalidated by words; he is opposed by R. Simeon ben Laqish. As an Amora, R. Joḥanan should not have the authority to contradict a Mishnah.16For money transactions, this is credited to R. Johanan in the Babli, 32b.. Explain it in a fully constituted court17He will hold that even in earlier times the agency could be revoked only by a public act of the local court who was presumed to transmit a copy of the document to the court at the wife’s place of residence..
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Verset précédentChapitre completVerset suivant