Talmud sur Tohorot 5:5

שְׁנֵי שְׁבִילִין, אֶחָד טָמֵא וְאֶחָד טָהוֹר, הָלַךְ בְּאַחַד מֵהֶן וְעָשָׂה טָהֳרוֹת, וּבָא חֲבֵרוֹ וְהָלַךְ בַּשֵּׁנִי וְעָשָׂה טָהֳרוֹת, רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר, אִם נִשְׁאֲלוּ זֶה בִפְנֵי עַצְמוֹ וְזֶה בִפְנֵי עַצְמוֹ, טְהוֹרִין. וְאִם נִשְׁאֲלוּ שְׁנֵיהֶם כְּאֶחָד, טְמֵאִים. רַבִּי יוֹסֵי אוֹמֵר, בֵּין כָּךְ וּבֵין כָּךְ, טְמֵאִים:

Deux chemins, un impur et un pur, si quelqu'un marchait dans l'un d'eux et préparait ensuite des choses pures, puis son compagnon venait et descendait le second et préparait des choses pures, Rabbi Yehuda dit: Si chacun d'eux s'enquit individuellement [ concernant son propre statut de pureté], ils sont tous les deux purs, mais s'ils se sont renseignés ensemble, ils sont impurs. Rabbi Yose dit: dans les deux cas, ils sont impurs.

Jerusalem Talmud Terumot

Rebbi Joḥanan said, a doubt of dema‘ is free from ḥallah¹¹²Halakhah Ḥallah 1:3, on condition that the profane grain be more than the amount causing the dema‘. but a doubt of dema‘ which is eaten as dema‘ is subject to ḥallah¹¹³In the case of the two boxes, when we declare that there is no dema‘ but we require the grain to be eaten as if there were.. Rebbi Joḥanan said, this follows Rebbi Jehudah, as we have stated there¹¹⁴Mishnah Ṭahorot 5:5: “Two roads, one impure [it leads over a grave whose exact position is unknown] and one pure [and it is unknown which is which]. A person walked on one of them and prepared food in purity, another person walked on the other and prepared food in purity. Rebbi Jehudah says, if they ask together …”: “If they ask together, they are impure. One after the other they are pure. Rebbi Yose says, in both cases they are impure.” Where do we hold? If somebody comes to ask about himself and his friend. Rebbi Jehudah says, he says: ask about yourself¹¹⁵Since this is a doubt of impurity in the public domain, it has to be declared pure. and go away. But Rebbi Yose said, it is as if both of them asked together¹¹⁶While R. Yose must agree that singly their doubts must be resolved for purity, if there is a logical necessity (“in any way you look at it”) that one of them must be impure, that logical necessity overrides the rule about doubts.. And here it is as if both of them asked together¹¹⁷Even R. Jehudah must agree that in the case of the two boxes one cannot ask about one and then go away. R. Joḥanan wants to say that the baraita follows not only R. Yose but even R. Jehudah..

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Verset précédent Chapitre complet Verset suivant