Mishnah
Mishnah

Commentaire sur Nedarim 2:3

יֵשׁ נֶדֶר בְּתוֹךְ נֶדֶר, וְאֵין שְׁבוּעָה בְּתוֹךְ שְׁבוּעָה. כֵּיצַד, אָמַר הֲרֵינִי נָזִיר אִם אֹכַל, הֲרֵינִי נָזִיר אִם אֹכַל, וְאָכַל, חַיָּב עַל כָּל אַחַת וְאֶחָת. שְׁבוּעָה שֶׁלֹּא אֹכַל, שְׁבוּעָה שֶׁלֹּא אֹכַל, וְאָכַל, אֵינוֹ חַיָּב אֶלָּא אֶחָת:

Il y a un vœu dans un vœu, mais il n'y a pas de serment dans un serment. Comment? S'il disait: «Je serai un Naziréen si je mange; je serai un Naziréen si je mange», il est responsable de chaque vœu. (S'il a dit :) "Je jure que je ne mangerai pas; je jure que je ne mangerai pas", et il a mangé, il n'est responsable que d'un seul. [Il devient Naziréen pendant trente jours s'il dit: "Je serai Nazirien", sans réserve. Et il apporte l'offrande nazirite, et redevient naziréen selon le nombre de fois qu'il a juré. Et avec un serment, il n'est responsable que pour un seul, recevant des coups une seule fois. Mais s'il obtient l'absolution pour le premier serment, le second tient. Et, de même, s'il obtient l'absolution pour le deuxième serment, le troisième tient; et il n'est pas autorisé à manger jusqu'à ce qu'il soit absous de tout. Car nous n'avons pas appris: "C'est un serment", mais: "Il n'est responsable que d'un seul."]

Bartenura on Mishnah Nedarim

חייב על כל אחת ואחת – and he will a Nazir for thirty days if he said, I am an undefined Nazir, nad he will bring the Nazirite sacrifice and return to be a Nazir according to the number of times that he said, “I will be a Nazir.” But regarding an oath, he is not liable other than for one [sacrifice,” for he is not flogged/whipped other than one set of stripes. But if he made a request to be released on the first oath, the second oath takes effect. And similarly, if he made a request to be released on the second [oath], the third takes effect. But he is is forbidden to eat until he all of them are not binding, because it does not teach in the Mishnah, “behold this is one oath,” but rather, “he is only liable for one count only.”
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Nedarim

Introduction This mishnah continues to draw distinctions between vows and oaths.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Nedarim

There is a vow within a vow, but not an oath within an oath. This section teaches that there is an additional stringency in vows that does not exist for oaths. One can make two vows on the same thing but not two oaths. The mishnah will now explain how this can happen.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Nedarim

How is this so? If one declares, “Behold, I will be a nazir if I eat [this thing]”; “Behold, I will be a nazir if I eat [this thing]” and then he eats [it], he is liable for each and every one. “I swear that I will not eat [this thing]”, “I swear that I will not eat [this thing]” and then he eats [it], he is only liable for one oath. If a person said twice that he will be a nazir if he eats a certain thing, and then he eats that thing, he must be a nazir twice. Since an unspecified nazirite period is thirty days (we will learn more about this in the next tractate), this person must act as a nazir for sixty days. However, if he takes two oaths that he will not eat a certain thing, and then eats it, he is only liable for breaking one oath. If he breaks the oath intentionally he only receives one set of lashes, and if accidentally, he only brings one sacrifice.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Verset précédentChapitre completVerset suivant