Si elle disait: "Konam, que je ne goûterai pas ces figues et ces raisins", s'il le faisait (le vœu) représenter des figues, tout cela tient. S'il l'a annulée pour les figues, elle n'est annulée que lorsqu'il l'a annulée également pour les raisins. [La raison: (Nombres 30:14): "Son mari yekimmenu" ("Son mari le fera tenir.") "Yakim mimenu" ("Il en fera tenir une partie.") Quand il en fera tenir une partie. il reste debout, il fait que tout cela reste debout. Mais "yeferenu" ("Il l'annulera") ne peut pas être expliqué ainsi, de sorte qu'il n'y a pas d'annulation tant qu'il n'a pas annulé tout cela. Ceci est une opinion individuelle et n'est pas la halakha, la halakha étant en accord avec les sages, qui disent: Causer pour se tenir est assimilé à l'annulation, à savoir: Tout comme avec l'annulation, ce qu'il a annulé est annulé, et ce qu'il n'a pas l'annulation n'est pas annulée (il n'est pas possible d'exposer "yeferenu" comme une annulation partielle), donc à faire tenir. Ce qu'il a fait tenir, tient; et ce qu'il n'a pas fait tenir, ne tient pas. (Car "yekimmenu" n'est pas non plus présenté comme une confirmation partielle, c'est la manière de l'écrire ainsi.) Et même s'il s'agit de l'absolution (hatarah) d'un sage, nous disons: "Si l'on est absous d'une partie d'un vœu qu'il soit dispensé de tout cela, "avec l'annulation du mari et du père, il n'en est rien.] Si elle disait:" Konam, que je ne goûterai pas de figues et que je ne goûterai pas de raisin ", ce sont deux vœux.
Bartenura on Mishnah Nedarim
קיים לתאנים כולו קיים כו' (he confirmed the vow regarding figs, the whole is deemed confirmed) – and the reason, as it is written (Numbers 30:14): “[Every vow and every sworn obligation of self-denial] may be upheld by her husband [or annulled by her husband,” he will uphold from it, that when he upholds part of it, he upholds all of it. But, (ibid.,) “annulled [by her husband],” one cannot expound as such, for it is not annulled until he annuls all of it. But these are the words of an individual opinion, and is not Halakha, but the Halakha is according to the Sages who sate that one makes an analogy on the principle common in both, making an analogy between הקמה/upholding and הפרה/nullifying/absolving. Just as regarding absolution, what he absolved, he absolved, and what he didn’t absolve, he didn’t absolve, for there is no expounding from annulling/יפרנו (Numbers 30:14), partial annulment, even upholding – what he upheld heupheld, and what he didn’t uphold, he didn’t uphold, and from יקימנו/upheld [by her husband] (Numbers 30:14),also, we don’t expound partial upholding, but it is the manner of Scripture to write like this. But even though the declaring permitted by a Sage we state that a vow that was partially permitted, all of it was permitted, but the absolution of the husband and the father is not like this.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Nedarim
Introduction
This mishnah teaches that a vow that has been partially annulled is not annulled at all.
We should note that this is a different rule than that which we saw with regard to the releasing of vows done by a sage. There we saw that according to Rabbi Akiva a vow that has been partially released is fully released (9:6). According to the Talmud, Rabbi Akiva disagrees with our mishnah.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Nedarim
If she vows, “Konam these figs and grapes which I taste”, and he [the husband] confirms [the vow] in respect of figs, the whole [vow] is confirmed; In the cases in this mishnah, the woman vows not to have figs and grapes. If the husband confirms part of the vow, the whole vow is confirmed. After he has confirmed it, he can no longer annul it.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Nedarim
If he annuls it in respect of figs, it is not annulled, unless he annuls in respect of grapes too. However, if he annuls part of the vow, the whole vow is not annulled and she is still forbidden in respect to that which he annulled. In this case, she would be forbidden to have both figs and grapes. For the vow to be annulled he must annul the whole vow.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Nedarim
If she vows, “Konam the figs that I taste and these grapes that I taste”, they are two distinct vows. In this case the mishnah considers it as if she had taken two vows. Therefore, if he annuls the vow with respect to figs, that vow is annulled and she may have figs but she may not have grapes.
