Mishnah
Mishnah

Commentaire sur Ketoubot 1:3

הַגָּדוֹל שֶׁבָּא עַל הַקְּטַנָּה, וְקָטָן שֶׁבָּא עַל הַגְּדוֹלָה, וּמֻכַּת עֵץ, כְּתֻבָּתָן מָאתַיִם, דִּבְרֵי רַבִּי מֵאִיר. וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים, מֻכַּת עֵץ, כְּתֻבָּתָהּ מָנֶה:

Un adulte (homme) qui a vécu avec un mineur [moins de trois ans et un jour, dont l'acte n'est pas considéré comme un rapport sexuel], et un mineur (homme) [moins de neuf ans et un jour, dont l'acte n'est pas considéré comme un rapport sexuel ], qui vivait avec un adulte, et une mukkath etz [une femme qui avait été accidentellement déflorée] —leur kethubah est de deux manah. Ce sont les paroles de R. Meir. Les sages disent: La kethubah d'un mukkath etz est un manah. [La halakha est en accord avec eux. Et même s'il n'en était pas conscient, sa kethubah est un manah, et ce n'est pas un «achat erroné»].

Bartenura on Mishnah Ketubot

שבא על הקטנה – [a minor girl who is] less than three years and one day [old], for her coition is not coition.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Ketubot

Introduction This mishnah discusses three types of women who don’t fit into the normal categories of virgin/non-virgin. This is either because they have had sexual intercourse but didn’t lose their physical signs of virginity, or because they are not physically virgins, even though they never had intercourse.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Ketubot

וקטן – [a minor boy who is] less than nine [years of age] as his coition is not coition if he engages in sexual relations with an adult women.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Ketubot

When an adult has had sexual intercourse with a young girl, or when a small boy has had intercourse with an adult woman, or a girl who was injured by a piece of wood [in all these cases] their kethubah is two hundred [zuz], the words of Rabbi Meir. But the Sages say: a girl who was injured by a piece of wood her kethubah is a maneh. There are three women mentioned in this mishnah. The first is a young girl who had intercourse with an adult man. As we mentioned in yesterday’s mishnah, the Sages believed that if a girl has sexual intercourse before three, her hymen will regenerate when she gets older. Therefore, when this girl gets older she will have her physical signs of virginity, even though she has had sexual intercourse. The second woman is an adult woman who had sexual intercourse with a young boy. According to the Sages a boy less than nine years old cannot have real intercourse, such that he causes a woman to lose her virginity. Again, this woman has her physical signs of virginity, but she has had sexual intercourse. The third woman is called a “mukath etz”, literally translated as “hit by a stick”. This refers to a woman who lost her hymen by something other than intercourse. In our day we might say she went horseback riding. This woman no longer has physical signs of virginity, but she has never had sexual intercourse. According to Rabbi Meir, all three of these women receive a full ketubah. According to Rabbi Meir in order to be considered a non-virgin a woman must have lost her physical signs of virginity through sexual intercourse. The Sages rule that the “mukath etz” does not receive a full ketubah. The Sages seem to define “virginity” by physicality alone: one who does not have her physical signs of virginity is not a “halakhic” virgin and does not receive a ketubah of 200 zuz.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Ketubot

ומוכת עץ – if [piece of wood] had been inserted in her at that same place
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Ketubot

כתובתן מאתים – it they simply married in an undefined manner
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Ketubot

וחכמים אומרים: מוכת עץ כתובתה מנה – And the Halakha is according to the Sages, and even if he did not know her, her Ketubah is a Maneh, and it is considered an errant purchase.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Verset précédentChapitre completVerset suivant