R. Yochanan b. Gudgeda a témoigné qu'une sourde-muette dont le père l'a épousée est divorcée. [Même si elle était une femme mariée de bonne foi, son père ayant accepté ses fiançailles quand elle était mineure, elle a quand même un get, et elle le reçoit quand elle est sourde-muette, même si son consentement fait défaut . Car une femme peut être divorcée de force, de sorte que son consentement n'est pas requis.]; et que la fille mineure d'un Israélite [un orphelin, dont le mariage est sanctionné par le rabbin (et non par les Écritures)] mange de la terumah [terumah mandatée par la rabbinisme, ceci n'étant pas décrétée en raison de (la possibilité qu'elle vienne manger) Terumah prescrite par les Écritures ]; et que si elle meurt, son mari hérite d'elle; et que si l'on construisait une poutre qu'il avait volée dans un bâtiment, le remboursement monétaire suffit, [pour le bien du pénitent; car s'il était obligé de raser son bâtiment et de rendre la poutre elle-même, il serait dissuadé de se repentir.]; et qu'une offrande pour le péché volée, qui n'était pas connue de beaucoup [comme étant volée] expie [et une autre n'a pas besoin d'être apportée], pour "le bien de l'autel," [que les Cohanim ne soient pas affligés par (la pensée de ) ayant mangé du chullin (nourriture non consacrée) d'un (animal) abattu dans l'azarah (la cour du Temple) et l'autel soit "déserté", les Cohanim s'abstenant d'accomplir le service (sacrificiel).]
Bartenura on Mishnah Gittin
על החרשת שהשיאה אביה – and even though she is a completely married woman, for her father had received her betrothal when she was a child/minor, even so she goes free with a Jewish bill of divorce and receives her Jewish bill of divorce while she is deaf-mute; and even though she lacks “knowledge,” since a woman is divorced against her will, therefore, we don’t require “knowledge.”
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Gittin
Introduction
This same exact mishnah appears in Eduyoth 7:9. It is brought here because it contains two “takkanot” (in sections three and four).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Gittin
וכל קטנה בת ישראל שנשאת לכהן – and she is an orphan, and her marriage is not valid other than according to the Rabbis.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Gittin
Rabbi Nehunia ben Gudgada testified concerning a deaf-mute whose father had given her in marriage, that she could be sent away with a bill of divorcement; As we have learned in other places, the Rabbis considered a deaf-mute to lack intelligence, because in their time the deaf-mute had little way of communicating with the outside world. Usually a person who lacks intelligence, such a deaf-mute, minor or insane person, cannot enter into legally binding contracts, because they don’t understand their ramifications. However, as Rabbi Nehunia testifies, a deaf-mute can be divorced. (She was married off by her father). The reason is that divorce is not dependent upon the woman’s acquiescence; she can be divorced against her will. Since her will is irrelevant, even one who lacks awareness can be divorced. Although this might sound harsh, as if the Rabbis are going out of their way to allow a deaf-mute to be divorced, it may have also worked in her benefit. If men couldn’t divorce deaf-mutes, perhaps they might refrain from marrying them. By allowing a “way out” the Rabbis might actually be encouraging their marriage.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Gittin
שאוכלת בתרומה – according to the Rabbis, for we do not make the decree that [eating] Terumah/heave-offering according to the Rabbis is like [eating] Terumah of the Torah-law.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Gittin
And concerning a minor, daughter of an Israelite who married a priest, that she could eat terumah, and if she died her husband inherited from her; This section deals with an orphaned minor girl of a non-priestly, Israelite family, who marries a priest. Generally this type of marriage is considered to be valid only rabbinically (derabanan) and not valid through Torah law (deoraita). Deoraita a minor can only be married off by her father. Only when she reaches majority she can marry herself off without her father’s aid. Despite the fact that this is really only a “derabanan” marriage, Rabbi Nehunya testifies that it is sufficient for her to be allowed to eat terumah and for her husband to inherit her, should she die. Even though these are usually rights only given to a valid “deoraita” marriage, Rabbi Nehunya testifies that the husband does receive these rights.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Gittin
מריש – beam
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Gittin
And concerning a stolen beam that had been built into a palace, that it might be restored by the payment of its value, because of the enactment to encourage repentance. Usually one who steals an item must return the actual stolen item, as long as the item still exists. If one stole a beam and then used it in the foundation of a castle, legally he is bound to take down the castle and return the beam. Obviously this will discourage people from admitting that they stole. This admission is an essential part of making atonement for their crime. To allow people to more easily make atonement, the robber is allowed to pay back the value of the beam.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Gittin
בירה – a large house
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Gittin
And concerning a sin-offering that had been stolen, and this was not known to many, that it caused atonement because of the welfare of the altar. If it were forbidden to use animals that might have been stolen as sacrifices, the priests would never sacrifice an animal, lest it be stolen. Therefore, the mishnah rules that stolen animals can be used as sin-offerings, and that they do procure atonement for the one bringing them, as long as the theft is not publicly known. This mishnah is not permission to steal an animal and bring it as a sacrifice. Rather it is permission to use an animal without being concerned that it is stolen property. The mishnah teaches that if it was stolen property and the person who brought it did not know that it was stolen, that it is effective in bringing atonement.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Gittin
מפני תקנת השבים – for it you require him [i.e., the thief] to take down (literally, “exterminate”) his home (or an entire group of buildings) and return the [stolen] beam itself (see Talmud Gittin 47a), he would be prevented from repenting.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Gittin
שלא נודעה לרבים – that t was stolen
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Gittin
שהיא מכפרת – and there is no need to bring another.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Gittin
מפני תקון מזבח – so that the Kohanim will not be sad that they unconsecrated meat that was slaughtered in the Temple courtyard, and it would lead to the altar being void, that they were prevented from performing the Temple ritual.
