Si une (personne) de l'extérieur a oublié et n'a pas fait d'érouv, l'intérieur est autorisé et l'extérieur interdit. (Si une personne) de l'intérieur (oublié) et n'a pas fait d'érouv, les deux sont interdits, [car l'intérieur est "un pied interdit", et il interdit (l'extérieur)]. S'ils ont placé leur érouv au même endroit, et que l'un d'eux a oublié, que ce soit une personne intérieure ou extérieure, et qu'il n'a pas fait un érouv, les deux sont interdits. [S'ils ont fait un érouv l'un avec l'autre et placé l'érouv à l'extérieur (cela s'appelle "un endroit" parce que les deux cours l'utilisent en commun), et même si une personne extérieure a oublié et n'a pas fait un érouv, les deux sont interdits. L'intérieur est également interdit de transporter dans sa cour, car il ne peut pas se dissocier de l'extérieur et utiliser (la cour intérieure) par lui-même, car son érouv n'est pas présent. Pour cet érouv qui permet la cour (intérieure) a été prise à l'extérieur. Mais si l'érouv était placé dans l'intérieur, l'extérieur est interdit par l'oubli de l'intérieur, mais l'intérieur n'est pas interdit par l'oubli de l'extérieur, car «il (l'intérieur) verrouille la porte» et l'utilise.] Mais s'ils (les cours) appartenaient à des individus, [c'est-à-dire s'il n'y en a qu'un à l'intérieur et un à l'extérieur], ils n'ont pas besoin de faire un érouv [entre eux à cause de drisath haregel], car puisqu'il n'y a que une personne à l'intérieur, c'est «un pied qui est permis», et cela n'interdit pas (l'extérieur). Cette Mishnah anonyme est conforme au premier tanna (ci-dessus), qui soutient qu '«un pied qui est autorisé» ne l'interdit pas.]
Bartenura on Mishnah Eruvin
שכח אחד מן הפנימית כו' – it was the inside [courtyard] the foot is prohibited [from carrying] and restricts.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Eruvin
Introduction
This mishnah continues to deal with two courtyards, an inner one and an outer one.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Eruvin
נתנו ערובן במקום אחד – both of them made Eruvin one with the other and placed the Eruv in the outer [courtyard] and called it one place because both of the courtyards use it as one and even one from the outer courtyard forgot and did not make an Eruv, both of them are forbidden [to carry in] for even the inner [courtyard] is also forbidden to carry in its courtyard for it cannot be removed from the outer [courtyard] to use it for itself for it lacks an Eruv over it for that same Eruv that permits [carrying] in the courtyard, they carried it to the outer [courtyard] but placed the Eruv in the inner [courtyard], the outer courtyard prohibits through the forgetfulness of the [people of the] inner [courtyard, but the inner [courtyard] but the inner [courtyard] does not prohibit through the forgetfulness of the [people of the] outer [courtyard] for they use one entrance.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Eruvin
If one of the [residents] of the outer courtyard forgot to participate in the eruv, the inner courtyard is permitted but the outer one is forbidden. If one of the residents of the outer courtyard forgot to participate in their eruv, the eruv of that courtyard is ineffective, as we have learned several times in this chapter. However, the inner courtyard’s eruv is still valid, since it doesn’t depend on that of the outer one.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Eruvin
ואם היו של יחידים – for the [people of] the inner [courtyard are not other than one, and the outer [courtyard] is only one, there is no need to make an Eruv each with the other because of foot traffic, for since it is of an individual in the inner [courtyard], it would be the foot that permits and does not restrict, and the anonymous Mishnah is according to the first Tanna/teacher of above that holds that the foot which permits does not restrict.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Eruvin
If one of the [residents] of the inner courtyard forgot to contribute to the eruv, both courtyards are forbidden. In this case, since the inner courtyard’s eruv is invalid, the outer courtyard’s eruv is ineffective as well (as we learned in section two of yesterday’s mishnah).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Eruvin
If they gave their eruv in the same place and one [resident], whether of the inner courtyard or of the outer courtyard, forgot to contribute to the eruv, both courtyards are forbidden. If both courtyards put their eruv together, they become like one domain with one eruv. Therefore, if even one resident from either courtyard forgot to participate in the eruv, it becomes forbidden to carry in either courtyard. This is like the normal situation where one person forgot to participate in the eruv, thereby causing it to be forbidden to carry in the entire courtyard.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Eruvin
If the courtyards belonged to individuals, they need not prepare any eruv. If each courtyard belongs to an individual, then neither must set up an eruv in order to carry within his own courtyard. This opinion matches that which was taught in section three of yesterday’s mishnah, that if each courtyard sets up its own eruv, the residents of each may carry in their own courtyard.
