Talmud sobre Yevamot 4:2

הַכּוֹנֵס אֶת יְבִמְתּוֹ, וְנִמְצֵאת מְעֻבֶּרֶת וְיָלָדָה, בִּזְמַן שֶׁהַוָּלָד שֶׁל קְיָמָא, יוֹצִיא וְחַיָּבִין בַּקָּרְבָּן. וְאִם אֵין הַוָּלָד שֶׁל קְיָמָא, יְקַיֵּם. סָפֵק בֶּן תִּשְׁעָה לָרִאשׁוֹן, סָפֵק בֶּן שִׁבְעָה לָאַחֲרוֹן, יוֹצִיא וְהַוָּלָד כָּשֵׁר, וְחַיָּבִין בְּאָשָׁם תָּלוּי:

Si uno se casa con su yevamah, y él la encuentra embarazada, y ella da a luz —si el niño vivió, debe enviarla lejos, y ellos deben traer una ofrenda (pecado) [porque convivió con la esposa de su hermano fuera del contexto de mitzvá (es decir, yibum), y el niño es kasher en cualquier caso]. Y si el niño no vive, ella permanece con él. Si no estaba claro si el niño nació nueve meses del primero o siete meses del segundo, debe enviarla, el niño es kasher y deben traer una ofrenda de culpa suspendida. [Porque en todos los casos en que uno es responsable de cometer una transgresión intencional, y de una ofrenda por el pecado por transgresión involuntaria, es responsable de una ofrenda por el pecado suspendida por una posible transgresión.]

Jerusalem Talmud Ketubot

The word of Rebbi Zera²⁵⁵This is the Babylonian spelling of Ze‘ira. implies that a child of unknown paternity is qualified, for Rebbi Ze‘ira asked before Rebbi Yasa²⁵⁶It is clear that R. Ze‘ira asked before his teacher R. Yasa, not before his student’s student R. Yose.: Is it the same for families²⁵⁷In the Mishnah, Rabban Gamliel and R. Eliezer declare than one believes the woman if she says that her child is a Cohen’s. Mishnah Qiddušin4:1 excludes a child of unknown paternity from marrying most Jews. What is the relation of the two Mishnaiot?? He said to him, so says Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish: There, for families²⁵⁸If somebody looks after the purity of his blood line, he should follow the Mishnah in Qiddušin., but here for sanctified food in the country²⁵⁹“Sanctified food in the country” is heave. The child is empowered to eat heave; this implies that he is qualified for certain aspects of the priesthood (on the model of the local priests in Josiah’s reform, 2K. 23:9).. The word of Rebbi Samuel ben [Rav] Isaac implies that a child of unknown paternity is disqualified, for Rebbi Samuel ben Rav Isaac asked: Does this mean that a child of unknown paternity is does not exist following Rabban Gamliel and Rebbi Eliezer, only following Rebbi Joshua? He turned around and said, a child of unknown paternity is possible following Rabban Gamliel and Rebbi Eliezer, if she remains silent. And even if you say that she talks, if she said that she does not know²⁶⁰If the mother states that she does not know the identity of the child’s father, the child doubtless is of unknown paternity..

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Versículo anterior Capítulo completo Versículo siguiente