Talmud sobre Terumot 10:1
בָּצָל שֶׁנְּתָנוֹ בְתוֹךְ עֲדָשִׁים, אִם שָׁלֵם, מֻתָּר. וְאִם חִתְּכוֹ, בְּנוֹתֵן טַעַם. וּשְׁאָר כָּל הַתַּבְשִׁיל, בֵּין שָׁלֵם בֵּין מְחֻתָּךְ, בְּנוֹתֵן טַעַם. רַבִּי יְהוּדָה מַתִּיר בְּצַחֲנָה, שֶׁאֵינוֹ אֶלָּא לִטֹּל אֶת הַזֻּהֲמָא:
Una cebolla [de Terumah , producto consagrado para consumo sacerdotal] que se colocó en lentejas: si [la cebolla estaba] entera, está permitido; pero si se corta, [está prohibido si] imparte un sabor. En el caso de todos los demás platos, ya sea [la cebolla] entera o cortada, [está prohibido si] imparte un sabor. El rabino Yehudah lo permite en el caso del pescado en salmuera, porque se usa solo para eliminar el sabor desagradable.
Jerusalem Talmud Nazir
94This and the next paragraph are from ‘Orlah 2:6 (Notes 136–152). Rebbi Abbahu in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan: One does not whip for anything imparting taste until he tasted the forbidden thing itself. Rebbi Ḥiya bar Yosef objected before Rebbi Joḥanan: Take, for example, meat in milk, where he did not taste the forbidden thing itself and you say that he is whipped! He accepted that. What is meant by: he accepted that? Rebbi Ḥiya bar Abun said before Rebbi Ze‘ira: Like a person who listens to the argument of the opposing party he accepted it.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy