Talmud sobre Terumot 1:3
קָטָן שֶׁלֹּא הֵבִיא שְׁתֵּי שְׂעָרוֹת, רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר, תְּרוּמָתוֹ תְרוּמָה. רַבִּי יוֹסֵי אוֹמֵר, אִם עַד שֶׁלֹּא בָא לְעוֹנַת נְדָרִים, אֵין תְּרוּמָתוֹ תְרוּמָה. וּמִשֶׁבָּא לְעוֹנַת נְדָרִים, תְּרוּמָתוֹ תְרוּמָה:
Con respecto a un menor que no ha producido dos pelos [púbicos], el rabino Yehudah dice que su Terumah es [válido] Terumah . El rabino Yosi dice que si no ha alcanzado una edad de [responsabilidad por sus] votos, su Terumah no es [válida] Terumah . Cuando alcanza una edad [de responsabilidad por sus] votos, su Terumah es [válido] Terumah .
Jerusalem Talmud Yevamot
According to Rebbi Eliezer, may she repudiate him and collect a fine from him51Since for R. Eliezer any sex act with a minor girl is a seduction, may she repudiate him and go to court to collect the money due a virgin from her seducer?? According to Rebbi Joshua, may she repudiate him and collect a fine from another man52Assuming she was still a virgin; if she repudiated the man, may she claim never to have been married and therefore be entitled to all the payments the seducer or the rapist of a virgin has to pay?? May she repudiate this one and invalidate her bill of divorce, a desecrated or a bastard53These are different questions taken together. If a Cohen married an underage girl forbidden to him and she repudiated him, does that retroactively free the Cohen from the guilt incurred in the marriage (and its eventual punishment)? Or if she repudiates a second marriage, may she return to the first husband even though for an adult that would be a transgression of a biblical prohibition; cf. Mishnaiot 4–6.? Rebbi Isaac asked, may she repudiate and return to her father’s food54The daughter of a Cohen married to an Israel. This is no problem for R. Eliezer since she never stopped eating Cohen’s food.? It is obvious that she does not return to her husband’s food55After he divorced her. The question whether the repudiating wife has any monetary claim on the husband is also asked in the Babli, Ketubot 53b, and is left unanswared (In the absence of a legal ruling, the claimant cannot prove his case and cannot collect.) since he writes for her: “You shall live in my house and be fed from my property,56Mishnah Ketubot 4:12.” and she is not in his house. Therefore, the only question is, may she repudiate and return to her father’s food?
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy