Mishná
Mishná

Talmud sobre Nedarim 1:1

כָּל כִּנּוּיֵי נְדָרִים כִּנְדָרִים, וַחֲרָמִים כַּחֲרָמִים, וּשְׁבוּעוֹת כִּשְׁבוּעוֹת, וּנְזִירוּת כִּנְזִירוּת. הָאוֹמֵר לַחֲבֵרוֹ, מֻדָּרְנִי מִמְּךָ, מֻפְרָשְׁנִי מִמְּךָ, מְרֻחָקְנִי מִמְּךָ, שֶׁאֵינִי אוֹכֵל לָךְ, שֶׁאֵינִי טוֹעֵם לָךְ, אָסוּר. מְנֻדֶּה אֲנִי לָךְ, רַבִּי עֲקִיבָא הָיָה חוֹכֵךְ בָּזֶה לְהַחֲמִיר. כְּנִדְרֵי רְשָׁעִים, נָדַר בְּנָזִיר, וּבְקָרְבָּן, וּבִשְׁבוּעָה. כְּנִדְרֵי כְשֵׁרִים, לֹא אָמַר כְּלוּם. כְּנִדְבוֹתָם, נָדַר בְּנָזִיר וּבְקָרְבָּן:

Todos los epítetos (kinuyei) de los votos son como los votos. [La gemara explica que falta la primera parte de nuestra Mishná y que esto es lo que significa: todos los yadoth ("manos") de los votos son como votos; Todos los epítetos de votos son como votos. Estos son yadoth de votos: si uno le dice a su vecino: "Estoy 'prometido' de ti", "estoy separado de ti", etc. Estos son epítetos de votos: "Konam", "Konach", "Konas, "etc." Manos de votos ": (yadoth) de votos, mediante los cuales se mantienen los votos. "Kinyei nedarim" ("epítetos de votos"), como en (Bava Metzia 58b) "hamechaneh shem lechavero" ("alguien que llama a su amigo por un epíteto", el "epíteto" (apodo) no es el nombre per se. ] Y (los epítetos) de las dedicaciones son como las dedicaciones, y (los epítetos) de los juramentos son como los juramentos, y (los epítetos) del naziritismo son como el naziritismo. Si uno le dice a su prójimo: "Estoy 'comprometido' de ti", "yo estoy separado de ti "," Estoy distanciado de ti "," Que no como de ti "," Que no pruebo de ti ", está prohibido (hacerlo). [Si usaba una de estas expresiones: "Estoy 'prometido' de que no como de ti y que no pruebo de ti", o: "Estoy separado de ti que no como de ti y que no pruebo de ti", o: "Yo Me alejo de ti que no como de ti y que no pruebo de ti ", estos son" yadoth "(" manos ") de votos, y tiene prohibido comer y probar de él. Pero si él dijo:" Yo estoy 'comprometido' de ti "solo, sus palabras implican solo que no hablará con él. d "Estoy separado de ti" solo implica que no tratará con él. Y "Estoy distanciado de ti" solo implica que no se sentará en sus cuatro codos. Pero no tiene prohibido comer con él a menos que especifique con cada una de estas expresiones: "que no como de ti y que no pruebo de ti".] (Si alguien dijera :) "Me quitan (" menudeh " ) de ti"—R. Akiva comprimiría 'sus labios' en esto hacia la rigurosidad, [no queriendo decir que prohibió (como un voto), pero es evidente que lo sostuvo para hacerlo.] "Como los votos de los impíos, un voto, con nazareo y con ofrenda, un juramento ". "Como los votos de los rectos", no ha dicho nada. [Si él dijo: "Lo tomo sobre mí como los votos de los impíos, cuyos votos son nazareos y ofrendas—un juramento de no comer este pan ", si él transgredió y se lo comió, debe ser nazareo durante treinta días, y traer una ofrenda quemada, y es propenso a las rayas como quien transgrede un juramento vano; porque él mencionó en su voto "Nazareo", "ofrenda" y "juramento". En cuanto a su dicho: "Como los votos de los impíos", esto es porque son los impíos quienes hacen los votos y los juramentos, no los rectos, los rectos temen la transgresión. de incumplimiento (de votos) y prestar atención a no pronunciar juramentos. Por lo tanto, si uno dice: "Como los votos de los rectos", no ha dicho nada.] "Como sus dones, un voto, con Nazareo y con ofrenda . "[Si él dijo:" Como los dones de los rectos, seré un nazareo, y esto será una ofrenda si como este pan ", si él lo comió, es responsable del naziritismo y de una ofrenda. los rectos a veces hacen un voto de naziritismo para separarse de lo que está prohibido, y dan una ofrenda como regalo, trayendo su ofrenda a la entrada de la azarah (la corte del templo) y consagrándolo allí, para no extraviarse a través de él. La expresión para un regalo es "Este (objeto) es" (un regalo), y la expresión para un voto "lo tomo sobre mí", por lo que los rectos dan regalos, pero no hacen votos, para que no vayan por mal camino.]

Jerusalem Talmud Gittin

HALAKHAH: “If somebody throws a bill of divorce to his wife,” etc. “He shall write,” “he shall deliver into her hand.” Not only into her hand; from where also into her garden or into her courtyard? The verse says “he shall deliver, he shall deliver.”4A shortened version of this argument is in the Babli, 77b. The argument follows R. Aqiba, who derives rules from every word which could be considered not absolutely necessary. Since “he shall deliver” is mentioned both in Deut. 24:1 and 24:3, he concludes that any legal delivery is acceptable. Is this following Rebbi Ismael? It is following Rebbi Aqiba. It was stated in the name of Rebbi Ismael5R. Ismael holds that “the Torah speaks in everybody’s language.” Therefore, if “hand” is to be interpreted as “possession”, a verse has to be found in which this sense is documented. This is Num. 21:26 which notes that Siḥon the Amorite “took all the land from the Moabite king’s hand”. Since land cannot be grasped in one’s hand, “hand” must mean “possession”. (A hint of this argument is in Sifry Deut. 269. The Babli, Baba Meṣi‘a 56b, following only R. Aqiba, accepts the interpretation of “hand” as “possession” only in extraordinary cases.), “he took all his land from his hand, up to the Arnon.” Did he take it out of his hand? What means “from his hand”? From his possession.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Nazir

HALAKHAH: “All substitute names1Num. 6:2 reads: “A man or a woman who clearly intend to vow the vow of a nazir, to become a nazir for the Eternal.” This makes it clear that making a vow of nazir, like any other vow, is implicitly an invocation of God’s name. The speaking of any vow therefore is an invocation of God’s name and this should be avoided; cf. Nedarim 1:1, Note 1. In this the vow of nazir is not different from any other vow. for nazir vows are like nazir vows,” etc. “All substitute names for vows are like vows,” etc. It is written12From the list mentioned in the Mishnah. “Any person who vows,” why does the verse say “a vow”? From here that substitute names for vows are like vows. “Or he swears,” why does the verse say “an oath”? From here that substitute names for oaths are like oaths. One reads that6The text is quoted from Nedarim 1:1, Notes 12–22. at the start of the first Chapter of Nedarim, up to: Rebbi Ismael stated: “any person who vows a vow of nazir”. From there that a person can obligate himself as nazir while he currently is a nazir.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Nazir

“I am” is a handle44As explained in Nedarim 1:1, Note 67, a handle of a vow is an expression of a vow used in disregard of the formal rules of vows. for nezirut, “I am obligated” is a handle for qorban45Not that he vowed a sacrifice but that it should be forbidden to him as if it were a sacrifice; cf. Introduction to Tractate Nedarim.. 46From here on, a parallel to the text is in Nedarim 1:1, Notes 75–77. Rebbi Eleazar in the name of Rebbi Hoshaiah: one catches him because of a handle for qorbān. Rebbi Abun bar Ḥiyya asked, if he said, I shall not eat from you, does one catch him because of a handle of an oath? Rebbi Yose said, 47In Nedarim, the text between people … people is missing. people usually say “an oath that I shall not eat from yours;” do they ever say “that I shall not eat from yours, an oath”? Rebbi Mattaniah said, people usually say “handle of an axe”; do they ever say “axe of a handle”?
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Nazir

The Mishnah follows Rebbi Jehudah since it was stated in the name of Rebbi Jehudah, the ancient pious ones desired to bring a purification offering, but the Omnipresent did not let a sin happen to them; so they made a vow of nazir in order to be able to bring a purification offering. Rebbi Simeon says, they became sinners because they made a vow of nazir, for it was said: “He shall atone for himself for what he sinned about the person,” that one sinned against his own person because he barred himself from [drinking] wine. It turns out that the position of Simeon the Just parallels Rebbi Simeon. As it was stated: Simeon the Just said, I never ate the reparation offering of a nazir except once. Once a man came to me from the South, I saw that he was handsome, with beautiful eyes and good looks, and his hair in waves. I said to him, my son, what induced you to cut off that beautiful hair? He said to me: Rabbi, I was a shepherd in my village and I went to fill the water vessel with water when I saw my mirror image in the water and my instinct rushed over me and tried to remove me from the World98Since the obligation is 29 days, the 30th day automatically is the day of celebration.. I said to it, wicked! You are rushing me to something which is not yours; it is upon me to sanctify you to Heaven! I embraced him, kissed him on his head and said, my son, there should be many more in Israel who fulfill the Omnipresent’s will like you. About you the verse says, “man or woman, if he clearly articulates vowing a vow of nazir, to be a nazir for the Eternal.” Rebbi Mana asked: Why following Simeon the Just, even following Rebbi Simeon? Did Simeon the Just never eat a purification offering for suet? Did Simeon the Just never eat a purification offering for blood? Simeon the Just holds that people make a vow while they are upset. Since they make the vow while they are upset, in the end, they wonder. But if he wonders, his sacrifices become similar to one of those who slaughtered profane animals in the Temple courtyard. But this one made a well thought-out dedication, when his mouth and his thoughts were in unison.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Capítulo completoVersículo siguiente