Mishná
Mishná

Talmud sobre Makot 1:5

בָּאוּ אֲחֵרִים וְהִזִּימוּם, בָּאוּ אֲחֵרִים וְהִזִּימוּם, אֲפִלּוּ מֵאָה, כֻּלָּם יֵהָרֵגוּ. רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר, אִסְטָסִית הִיא זוֹ, וְאֵינָהּ נֶהֱרֶגֶת אֶלָּא כַת הָרִאשׁוֹנָה בִלְבָד:

Si vinieron otros y ellos (los refutadores) les dieron zomemina; si vinieron otros y les dieron zomemina—incluso si fueran cien [conjuntos de testigos, dando el mismo testimonio uno tras otro, y todos refutados por el mismo conjunto], todos son asesinados. R. Yehudah dice: "Este conjunto (refutar) es istasith" [perverso y tortuoso, habiendo tomado un consejo entre ellos para refutar a quien venga a dar este testimonio. Otra interpretación: "¿Es esto (refutando establecer una tina de) isatis" (un tinte), (que tiñe a todos los que lo tocan)]! Y solo se mata al primer grupo de testigos. [R. Yehudah sostiene que después de que se refuta el primer conjunto, no se acepta el conjunto siguiente; y si testifican y son refutados, no son asesinados, no satisfacen: "Entonces le harás a él, etc.", porque él (el juzgado) no es asesinado por su testimonio. La halajá no está de acuerdo con R. Yehudah.]

Jerusalem Talmud Sheviit

Rebbi Eleazar said, this follows Rebbi Jehudah since he could ask him for payment on New Years’s Day. Rebbi Abba bar Mamal, Rav Amram, Rav Mattanah in the name of Rav: If somebody makes a loan to another person stipulating that he will not press for repayment, the Sabbatical will remit it58One should assume that the loan is not remitted in the Sabbatical since it can never be claimed and the Sabbatical law applies only to loans that can be claimed (Deut. 15:2).. We did state: “If somebody slaughters a cow and divides it up on New Year’s Day,” and Rebbi Eleazar said, this follows Rebbi Jehudah59Since it is assumed that payment cannot be claimed on New Year’s Day since it cannot be given.. But can he require payment on New Year’s Day? As Rebbi Abba said in the name of Rebbi Zeïra: Since he could ask him for payment, he can believe him. And since he could believe him, he could pay him60The case of the butcher cannot be used to support Rav’s statement; in practice, Rav’s statement is rejected.. And here, because he could have given him but did not give, the first [debt] is turned into a loan61This sentence does not belong here but to Mishnah 1, cf. Note 31..
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Versículo anteriorCapítulo completoVersículo siguiente