Mishná
Mishná

Talmud sobre Ketubot 4:10

לֹא כָתַב לָהּ, בְּנִין דִּכְרִין דְּיֶהֱווֹן לִיכִי מִנַּאי אִנּוּן יִרְתוּן כְּסַף כְּתֻבְּתִיךְ יָתֵר עַל חוּלְקֵיהוֹן דְּעִם אֲחוּהוֹן, חַיָּב שֶׁהוּא תְנַאי בֵּית דִּין:

(Si él no escribió :) "Te sentarás en mi casa y serás alimentado de mi propiedad todos los días de la duración de tu viudez en mi casa", él es (sin embargo) responsable (por esto), porque esto es un condición de beth-din. Los hombres de Jerusalén escribirían así. Los hombres de Galil escribirían como los hombres de Jerusalén. Los hombres de Judá escribirían: "... hasta que los herederos deseen darte tu kethubah". Por lo tanto, si los herederos lo desean, le dan su kethubah y la "eximen". [La halajá no está de acuerdo con los hombres de Judá; pero mientras ella no se case y no reclame su kethubah en beth-din, se alimenta de la propiedad de su esposo y vive en la casa donde vivía cuando su esposo estaba vivo, y usa todos los recipientes que ella usó en ella la vida del esposo.]

Jerusalem Talmud Bava Batra

HALAKHAH: “If one of co-owning brothers,” etc. It was stated61Cf. Tosephta 10:5.: If one of co-owning brothers was requisitioned for government service. If this was because of the sharecroppper62This makes no sense. The correct reading is given in Šiṭṭah mequbbeṣet ad 144b in the name of Ravad and Rashba Novellae ad 144b: brothers. Since only rich and well-known people were ordered to pay for the city services, if the estate was renowned for its riches, the estate had to pay for the cost of services. If it was because of the personal renown of the person appointed, he had to bear the cost., he takes because of the sharecropper62This makes no sense. The correct reading is given in Šiṭṭah mequbbeṣet ad 144b in the name of Ravad and Rashba Novellae ad 144b: brothers. Since only rich and well-known people were ordered to pay for the city services, if the estate was renowned for its riches, the estate had to pay for the cost of services. If it was because of the personal renown of the person appointed, he had to bear the cost.. If because of the head of household, he takes as head of household. As the following: Rav Naḥman bar Samuel bar Naḥman was appointed to the city council63Greek βουλή, responsible not only for city services but also for the collection of taxes.. The case came before Rebbi Immi. He said, if Naḥman who was caught has enough property, it should be given from his property; otherwise it should be given to him from the common estate.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Versículo anteriorCapítulo completoVersículo siguiente