Talmud sobre Keritot 3:5

יֵשׁ בָּא בִיאָה אַחַת וְחַיָּב עָלֶיהָ שֵׁשׁ חַטָּאוֹת. הַבָּא עַל בִּתּוֹ, חַיָּב עָלֶיהָ מִשּׁוּם בִּתּוֹ וַאֲחוֹתוֹ וְאֵשֶׁת אָחִיו וְאֵשֶׁת אֲחִי אָבִיו וְאֵשֶׁת אִישׁ וְנִדָּה. וְהַבָּא עַל בַּת בִּתּוֹ, חַיָּב עָלֶיהָ מִשּׁוּם בַּת בִּתּוֹ וְכַלָּתוֹ וַאֲחוֹת אִשְׁתּוֹ וְאֵשֶׁת אָחִיו וְאֵשֶׁת אֲחִי אָבִיו וְאֵשֶׁת אִישׁ וְנִדָּה. רַבִּי יוֹסֵי אוֹמֵר, אִם עָבַר הַזָּקֵן וּנְשָׂאָהּ, חַיָּב עָלֶיהָ מִשּׁוּם אֵשֶׁת אָב. וְכֵן הַבָּא עַל בַּת אִשְׁתּוֹ, וְעַל בַּת בַּת אִשְׁתּוֹ:

Hay [un caso en el que] alguien que comete un solo acto sexual puede ser responsable de seis chata'ot : uno que tiene relaciones con su hija, puede ser responsable [si ella es simultáneamente] su hija y su hermana, y la esposa de su hermano, y la esposa del hermano de su padre, y una mujer casada, y una Niddah [una mujer que ha menstruado y por lo tanto es impura]. Alguien que tiene relaciones con su hija.'s hija, puede ser responsable [si ella es simultáneamente] la hija de su hija, y su nuera, y la hermana de su esposa, y la esposa de su hermano, y la esposa del hermano de su padre, y una mujer casada, y una Niddah . El rabino Yose dijo: Si el abuelo transgredió [la ley] y se casó con ella, él es responsable porque ella es la esposa de su padre. Así también, si uno tuviera relaciones con la hija de su esposa, o con la hija de la hija de su esposa.

Jerusalem Talmud Yevamot

There, we have stated¹²⁰Keritut Mishnah 3:5. The Mishnah speaks of the grandfather’s grandson’s daughter’s daughter who was married to his brother. If that brother dies without issue, the widow is forbidden to her great-grandfather by a secondary prohibition. If the old man marries her in levirate instead of having ḥalîṣah as required, since the prohibition is rabbinic she is married and, if the son sleeps with her, Rebbi Yose the Tanna declares him guilty both for his granddaughter and his father’s wife, committing two sins in one act.: “Rebbi Yose says, if the grandfather transgressed and married her.” What did he transgress? He transgressed the words of the Sopherim¹²¹Three generations are biblically forbidden. She would be secondarily forbidden to the father. Since the Mishnah does not mention the father but “the old man”, generally interpreted as “grandfather”, this is one generation more than that spelled out in the Tosephta. Does this support R. Ḥanin that these prohibitions are unlimited in the number of generations?. Rebbi Yose in the name of Rebbi Abbahu, he asked Rebbi Joḥanan: Does this mean that secondary prohibitions have no limit? He said to him, did we learn “secondaries to secondaries”? No. Secondaries to the words of the Torah, and all of them because of his son’s daughter-in-law¹²²Rebbi Yose the Tanna does not refer to the first part of the Mishnah speaking of a granddaughter but has a new case where the woman was the son’s daughter-in-law before marrying the father’s brother who is permitted to her.. Rebbi Ḥizqiah in the name of Rebbi Jonah, Rebbi Abbahu did not say so, but Rebbi Eleazar asked Rebbi Joḥanan, did we not learn of eight secondaries, and here they are nine! But all of them because of his son’s daughter-in-law¹²³Since this case is the root of all secondary prohibitions it was not spelled out before; Babli Yebamot 21b..

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Versículo anterior Capítulo completo Versículo siguiente