R. Chanina, el sumo sacerdote ayudante, testificó: En todos mis días, nunca vi el escondite (de un bechor [un animal primogénito]) yendo al sitio en llamas [después de haber sido desollado, si fuera se descubrió que era treifah, a pesar de que el p'sul (el factor descalificador) estaba en él antes del desollamiento —ya que no fue reconocido hasta después del desollamiento]. R. Akiva dijo: De sus palabras, aprendemos que si uno flamea un bechor y se descubre que es una treifah, los Cohanim pueden disfrutar de su piel, y no se quema. [R. Akiva viene a dejarnos escuchar que incluso un bechor manchado, que es sacrificado fuera del santuario debido a su mancha, la Torá (que no ha permitido que sea sacrificada sino) solo para ser comida, está escrita (Deuteronomio 15:21) : "En tus puertas (es decir, fuera del santuario) lo comerás"—si murió, su piel está prohibida y requiere entierro. Y R. Akiva nos advirtió que cuando se trata de una treifah no se reconoce hasta después de desollado, su shechitah y su desollado permiten esconderse como si su sangre hubiera sido rociada en el santuario.] Los sabios dicen: "No hemos visto "no es una prueba [es decir, tal vez nunca sucedió en sus días que se descubrió que era treifah después de desollar, y si sucedió y lo quemaron, él no lo vio]; pero sale al sitio en llamas.
Bartenura on Mishnah Eduyot
לא ראיתי עור יוצא לבית השריפה – After its hide was flayed, if it was found torn. Even though that this disqualification was upon it prior to its hide being removed, since it was not recognized other than after the hide’s removal.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Eduyot
Introduction
Mishnah two discusses burning the hides of sacrificially unfit animals.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Eduyot
שהמפשיט את הבכור ונמצא טריפה – but Rabbi Akiva comes to teach us (a new point), that even a firstling which has defect when it is slaughtered outside of Jerusalem on its defect, and the Biblical verse did not permit it other than for eating, as it is written (Deuteronomy 15:22): “Eat it in your settlements [the unclean among you no less than the clean, just like the gazelle and the deer],” but if it died, its hide is forbidden and it requires burial, and Rabbi Akiva teaches us that where it is “terefah”/torn status is not known until after the hide is flayed, the permitted it to be slaughtered and the flaying of its hide is like its blood was cast in the Temple.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Eduyot
Rabbi Hanina, chief of the priests, said: “All my days I never saw a hide taken out to the place of burning.” Rabbi Akiba said: “From his words we infer that whoever flays the hide of the firstborn beast and it is found to be trefah, the priests may enjoy the use of the hide.” But the Sages say: “[A testimony which consists of] ‘we didn’t see’ is not a proof; rather the hide must be taken out to the place of burning. In Tractate Zevahim 12:4 the Mishnah teaches that if a sacrificial animal is found to be unfit as a sacrifice before it’s hide is flayed, the entire animal must be burnt. If it is found to be unfit after it’s hide is flayed, the priests may keep the hide. Rabbi Hanina testifies that he never saw a hide being burnt. In other words, according to Rabbi Hanina if they already removed the hide, the priests may make use of it, even though the animal was deemed unfit to be a sacrifice. Rabbi Akiva learns from this that if one flays the hide of a firstborn animal, which belongs to the priests, and then discovers that it was a trefah, an animal with an internal flaw that would have caused its death, the priests may keep the hide. Since the flaw was not known before the hide was removed, the hide becomes the property of the priests. The Sages respond to Rabbi Akiva that the type of testimony that Rabbi Hanina transmitted is not reliable enough to base upon it halakhic solutions. Not seeing something does not mean that it did not happen. Since they exclude Rabbi Hanina’s testimony the law is that the hide must be burnt with the rest of the animal, and the priests are forbidden to receive benefit from it.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Eduyot
יאותו הכהנים בעורו – and it is not burned.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Eduyot
אין לא ראיתי ראיה – lest it did not happen in his days that it would be found “terefah”/torn after the hide had been flayed, and if it happened and they burned it, he did not see it.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Eduyot
אלא יצא לבית השריפה – since prior to the flaying it had come. And the Halakha is according to Rabbi Akiva regarding a firstling with a defect when a specialist permitted it, but if a specialist did not permit it, no. And the Halakha is according to the Sages in regard to a pure firstling, that the flesh is buried and hide is burned.
