Talmud for Ketubot 7:11

It was stated⁵⁰Different texts are in Tosephta 1:4, Babli 21b.: About his neighbor he may change his mind. Once he accepted it he can no longer change his mind⁵¹There are situations where one of the co-owners of the courtyard has lost his veto power even if the troublesome store was new. The question to be discussed is, what means “accepted”? If a new owner does not immediately complain, this certainly does not make him lose his right.. Rabban Simeon ben Gamliel says, even after he accepted it, he can change his mind, for he can tell him, they come and go here, they are looking for you and do not find you, and they increase traffic here⁵²For him the veto power over a new enterprise in the courtyard remains valid if he can prove actual impairment of his quality of life by the new store.. Rebbi Ḥanina and Rebbi Mana, one said, what is “his neighbor”? He let him live in his house⁵³Nobody can complain about his own tenant.. Once he accepted it he can no longer change his mind. Rav Huna⁵⁴This should be: “the other”, אוחרי. said, one said, what is “his neighbor”? He opened a store for him⁵⁵He holds that an owner can annul a lease if the tenant causes him problems. But if he modified his building for the new tenant’s business, he cannot complain.. Once he accepted it he can no longer change his mind. Rabban Simeon ben Gamliel parallels Rebbi Meïr, as we have stated there⁵⁶Mishnah Ketubot 7:11, Note 163. A woman was informed of bodily defects of her prospective husband before her marriage. The majority hold that once married, she cannot ask the court to force a divorce because of the husband’s defects. R. Meїr disagrees as explained in the text.: “For all of these says Rebbi Meїr that, even if he contracted with her, she can say ‘I thought that I could stand it, now I cannot.’ ”