Die Nachkommen eines Chattats (Opfer, das zur Sühne der Sünde gebracht wurde) oder der Ersatz für ein Chattat oder ein Chattat, dessen Besitzer gestorben war, [sie sind zurückgezogen, bis] sie sterben. [Ein Chat ], dessen Jahr vergangen ist oder verloren gegangen ist und mit einem Makel gefunden wurde, wenn er, nachdem die Besitzer [mittels eines anderen Tieres] gesühnt hatten, [zurückgezogen] ist, bis er stirbt und keinen Ersatz darstellt. Man kann nicht [davon] profitieren, noch haftet man für meilah [profitiert von einem geweihten Gegenstand] [in Bezug darauf]. Wenn zuvor die Besitzer [mittels eines anderen Tieres] gesühnt hatten, sollte es grasen, bis es fehlerhaft wird und [dann] verkauft wird. Sein Erlös sollte verwendet werden, um ein anderes [mittels eines anderen Tieres] zu kaufen. Es kann einen Ersatz darstellen, und man haftet für meilah [in Bezug darauf].
Jerusalem Talmud Yoma
“Since no public purification sacrifice is let to die6In contrast to private purification sacrifices which are not used because the owner used another animal in its stead. It cannot be used for another person, cannot be redeemed, and cannot be used in any other way.. Rebbi Jehudah says, it shall die.” It is difficult for Rebbi Jehudah: does one draw lots originally to die? Rebbi Abun said, do we not find this following Rebbi Eliezer33It is sinful to try to replace a validly dedicated animal by an other (Lev. 27:10). In the case of (voluntary) well-being offerings, both animals are dedicated as well-being offerings. For obligatory offerings, two animals cannot be brought instead of one. In Mishnah Temurah 3:3, the majority rules that the replacement of a valid reparation offering and any of its offspring shall be put out to graze until they develop a defect which makes them unfit as sacrifices, then be sold, and the proceeds given to the Temple to be used for additional sacrifices, But R. Eliezer rules that they have to be allowed to die immediately without any benefit to the Temple. R. Jehudah as student of his father R. Illay, a student of R. Eliezer, can be presumed to follow the latter’s teachings., as Rebbi Eliezer said, they shall die? Rebbi Mana said, what you ask about Rebbi Jehudah you should ask about the Mishnah, as we have stated there34Mishnah Temurah 4:1. In case of a purification offering everybody agrees with R. Eliezer, and one of the he-goats for which lots are drawn is a purification offering., “the calf of a purification offering, and the replacement of a purification offering, and a purification offering whose owners died, shall die.” Would a person replace originally to die?
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jerusalem Talmud Pesachim
There90Mishnah Temurah4:1., we have stated: “The offspring of a purification offering91The purification offering from a private person is a female sheep or goat. If it produces a lamb, the lamb is a sanctum but since only its mother can be sacrificed, it may neither be redeemed nor used for any other sacrifice., and the substitute of a purification offering, and a purification offering whose owner died92Since it is dedicated, it may not be redeemed. As a purification offering, the dedication may not be transferred to the benefit of any other person (Mishna Zevaḥim 1:1)., …93The portion missing here states that all the previously enumerated animals must be allowed to die since they cannot be used; even if they develop a defect they cannot be sold., and whose year has passed94Sheep are acceptable as sacrifice only if one year old., and which was lost and found, defective95The question whether one has to read “which was lost and found defective” or “which was lost and found, and the defective” is resolved in the discussion in favor of the first alternative. For this second group the Mishnah prescribes that they have to die if found after the owners had offered a substitute but if found before that time they are to be put out to graze, to be sold once no longer qualified as sacrifices..”
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jerusalem Talmud Sanhedrin
HALAKHAH:Slaying you shall slay the inhabitants of that town by the sword, etc. 370Tosephta 14:5. Rebbi Simeon says, its domesticated animal, not first born or tithes found there; its booty, not Temple money or Second Tithe found there371All the items enumerated are Heaven’s property. While the second part of the verse insists that the town’s property must be destroyed, Heaven’s property cannot be destroyed. The disposal of Heaven’s property is discussed in Mishnah 9. Babli 112b.. Rebbi Yose ben Ḥanina asked: What is the status of hair of its just women372Since a woman could cut off her hair and sell it to a wig-maker, it represents value. Should the woman be forced to cut off her hair before she is forced to leave town following the conviction of the town for organized idolatry? Since Temple money must be taken out undamaged, so the just woman must be taken out unhurt. The Babli, 112a, somewhat disagrees.? Let us hear from the following: Rebbi Simeon says, its domesticated animal, not first born or tithes found there; its booty, not Temple money or Second Tithe found there. The sancta of a seduced town373Once an animal has been dedicated as sacrifice, all private use of it is larceny (Lev.5:14–16)., Rebbi Joḥanan said, one cannot commit larceny with them; Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish said, one can commit larceny with them. Rebbi Joḥanan objected to Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish: According to your opinion that one can commit larceny with them, should one not state that “six purification offerings are left to die”374Mishnah Temurah 4:1 enumerates 5 kinds of purification offerings which can neither be redeemed nor sacrificed. An animal dedicated by an idolator of a seduced town should be added as sixth kind. Babli 112a.? He answered, because in this case even an elevation offering dies375Mishnah Temurah 4:1 only treats cases particular to purification offerings.. Rebbi Hila in the name of Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish: One can commit larceny with them because of sancta of an apostate. Should they not be sacrificed? Because of the sacrifice of an evildoer is an abomination376Prov. 21:27. The Babli, Hulin 5a, finds the same result in Lev. 1:2.. Rebbi Uqba said, also in the following they disagree: 377Bava qamma 4:9, Notes 122–125 If a bull was led out to be stoned when its witnesses were found to be perjured, Rebbi Joḥanan said, the first to come acquires it; Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish said, it was false despair. Similarly, if a slave was led out to be executed when its witnesses were found to be perjured, Rebbi Joḥanan said, he acquired himself; Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish said, it was false despair.