Talmud zu Tahorot 7:1

הַקַּדָּר שֶׁהִנִּיחַ אֶת קְדֵרוֹתָיו וְיָרַד לִשְׁתּוֹת, הַפְּנִימִיּוֹת טְהוֹרוֹת, וְהַחִיצוֹנוֹת טְמֵאוֹת. אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹסֵי, בַּמֶּה דְבָרִים אֲמוּרִים, בְּמֻתָּרוֹת. אֲבָל בַּאֲגוּדוֹת, הַכֹּל טָהוֹר. הַמּוֹסֵר מַפְתְּחוֹ לְעַם הָאָרֶץ, הַבַּיִת טָהוֹר, שֶׁלֹּא מָסַר לוֹ אֶלָּא שְׁמִירַת הַמַּפְתֵּחַ:

Als Töpfer, der seine Töpfe verlassen und zum Trinken hinuntergegangen ist, sind die inneren Töpfe rein, aber die äußeren [diejenigen, die der Straße zugewandt oder gemeinfrei sind] sind unrein. Rabbi Yose sagt: Für welche Fälle gilt das? Ungebundene; aber wenn sie zusammengebunden sind, ist alles rein. Einer, der seinen [Haus] Schlüssel an einen am ha'aretz [eine nicht gelehrte Person, die als unrein angenommen wird] übergibt , das Haus ist rein, weil er ihm nur die [Rechte] der Bewachung des Schlüssels übergab .

Jerusalem Talmud Pesachim

¹¹⁴Qiddušin 1:4, Notes 435–438. Rebbi Jehudah bar Pazi said, I asked: What if he handed him the key¹¹⁵S. Liebermann points out that this cannot mean that the key was handed over after a contract for lease or sale was signed, since for a lease the matter was settled in the preceding paragraph and for a sale it is stated that transfer of the key is transfer of the property (Bava batra 3:1, Note 12). Nevertheless Sefer Haˋittur (vol. 2, p. 121a, Note 17) reads the question as complement of the preceding statement.? Rebbi Zachariah the son-in-law of Rebbi Levi said, this is the disagreement between Rebbi Simeon and the Sages, as we have stated there¹¹⁶Mishnah Tahorot 7:1. The vulgar person is one who does not observe the rules of purity. He is considered a source of original impurity; cf. Introduction to Tractate Demay.: “If somebody hands over his key to a vulgar person, the house remains pure since he only entrusted him with safekeeping the key.” It was stated: Rebbi Simeon declares it impure¹¹⁷Tosephta Tahorot 8:1. He holds that handing over the key implies authorization for unlimited entry into the premises..

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Kiddushin

Rebbi Jacob bar Aḥa, Rebbi Simeon bar Abba in the name of Rebbi Joshua ben Levi: If somebody sell a cistern, when he handed over its pail [the buyer] took possession⁴³⁴The Babli, Baba qama 51b, requires a declaration by the seller that the pail is handed over for possession.. Rebbi Immi in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan: If somebody sell a house, when [the buyer] stored there, he took possession. Rebbi Jehudah ben Pazi asked, what if he handed over the key⁴³⁵In the Babli, Baba qama 51b/52a, handing over the key as sign of transfer of possession is undeniably a valid action.? Rebbi Zachariah, son-in-law of Rebbi Levi, said: This is a disagreement between Rebbi Simeon and the Sages, as we have stated there⁴³⁶Mishnah Ṭahorot 7:1.: “If somebody hand over the key to his house to an ‘am ha’areṣ⁴³⁷A person who does not keep the rules of ritual purity. If he did enter the house, any movables (food and vessels) he touches there would become impure., the house is pure since he handed to him only the guarding of the key.” It was stated⁴³⁸Tosephta Ṭahorot 8:1. He implies, against the othet Tanna, that handing over the key implies permission to use the house.: “Rebbi Simeon declares impure.”

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Ganzes Kapitel Nächster Vers