Talmud zu Ketubot 13:4

הַטּוֹעֵן אֶת חֲבֵרוֹ כַדֵּי שֶׁמֶן, וְהוֹדָה בַקַּנְקַנִּים, אַדְמוֹן אוֹמֵר, הוֹאִיל וְהוֹדָה בְמִקְצָת הַטַּעֲנָה, יִשָּׁבֵעַ. וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים, אֵין זוֹ הוֹדָאָה מִמִּין הַטַּעֲנָה. אָמַר רַבָּן גַּמְלִיאֵל, רוֹאֶה אֲנִי אֶת דִּבְרֵי אַדְמוֹן:

Wenn man von seinem Freund Krüge mit Öl behauptet und er [leere] Krüge [ohne Öl] zugibt, wie wenn sein Freund sagt: "Du schuldest mir zehn Krüge Öl"], sagt Admon: Da er einen Teil der Krüge zugibt behaupten, er schwört. [Die Behauptung bezieht sich auf Öl und Krüge, so dass seine Zulassung zu leeren Krügen eine teilweise Zulassung darstellt, die einen Eid mit sich bringt. ] Und die Weisen sagen: Dies stellt keine Zulassung dar, die der Art des Anspruchs ähnelt. [Die Behauptung bezieht sich auf Öl allein in Höhe von zehn Krügen, so dass, wenn er leere Krüge zugibt, "das, was behauptet wird, nicht zugelassen wird und das, was zugelassen wird, nicht beansprucht wird", so dass es keine Zulassung gibt, die der Art der Krüge ähnelt Anspruch, und ein Eid ist nicht mit sich gebracht. ] R. Gamliel sagt: Ich unterschreibe die Worte von Admon. [Die Halacha stimmt mit Admon überein.]

Jerusalem Talmud Shevuot

MISHNAH: “You are holding for me a kor⁶⁴Biblical and Accadic measure of volume, 30 seah. of grain;” “I am holding for you only a letek⁶⁵A biblical measure of volume, half a kor. of legumes;” he is not liable. “You are holding for me a kor of produce;” “I am holding for you only a letek of legumes;” he is liable since legumes are subsumed under produce. If one sued for wheat and the other acknowledged barley, he is not liable, but Rebbi Simeon⁶⁶In all other sources, including the following Halakhah: Rabban Gamliel. He considers all grain to be of related kind. declares him liable. Somebody who sued for amphoras of oil and the other admitted to pitchers, Admon says since he admitted of the kind of the claim he has to swear. But the Sages say, the admission is not of the kind of the claim⁶⁷Admon (an authority of pre-rabbinic times) holds that the content of the vessels is determining; the Sages give preference to the determination of the vessels of storage.. Rabban Gamliel said, I see⁶⁸To see = to accept as obvious. the words of Admon.
If somebody sued for both vessels and real estate; if [the other] admitted the vessels but denied the real estate, or the real estate and denied the vessels, he is not liable⁶⁹One does not swear on claims of real estate (Mishnah 1). Therefore if the defendant acknowledged his debt of vessels, there is nothing left to take the oath. If he disputes all claims to vessels, there is no acknowledgment since admission of the duty to hand over real estate does not count.. If he admitted part of the real estate he is not liable⁶⁹One does not swear on claims of real estate (Mishnah 1). Therefore if the defendant acknowledged his debt of vessels, there is nothing left to take the oath. If he disputes all claims to vessels, there is no acknowledgment since admission of the duty to hand over real estate does not count.. Part of the vessels he is liable since non-guaranteed property obligates guaranteed property to be sworn about⁷⁰Mishnah Qiddušin1:5, Note 474. If the defendant is liable to take an oath, the claimant can add to the oath all of his outstanding claims even if they in themselves would not force an oath. This is known as “rolling over of oaths.”
A property is guaranteed if the seller as a matter of routine must guarantee the title to the property; this is the case with real estate..

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Vorheriger Vers Ganzes Kapitel Nächster Vers