R. Yishmael sagt: (Es muss geben) drei Hadasim, zwei Aravoth, einen Lulav und einen Ethrog —selbst wenn zwei von ihnen abgetrennt wurden und einer nicht. [Dies bezieht sich auf die Hadasim. Die Gemara fragt: Wenn ein abgetrennter Hadas Pasul ist und drei benötigt werden, lassen Sie drei ganze erforderlich sein; und wenn ein abgetrennter Hadas kasher ist, sollen drei abgetrennte kasher sein! Und die Gemara kommt zu dem Schluss, dass R. Yishmael seine Entscheidung, dass drei Hadasim erforderlich sind, zurückzog und er sogar zwei abgetrennte erlaubte. Und dasselbe (dass es kasher ist) würde gelten, wenn er sie überhaupt nicht mitbrachte, denn ein abgetrenntes Hadas wird als nicht existent angesehen.] R. Tarfon sagt: Selbst wenn (alle) drei abgetrennt wurden, (es ist kasher) ["Hadar" wird in einem Hadas nicht benötigt. Die Halacha stimmt mit R. Tarfon überein.] R. Akiva sagt: So wie ein Lulav und ein Ethrog (erforderlich) sind, so sind ein Hadas und eine Arava.
Bartenura on Mishnah Sukkah
אפילו שנים קטומין – it is referring to the myrtles/Hadasim and in the Talmud (Sukkah 34b) it raises the objection if they are broken on the top they are invalid, for it requires three and all of them whole, but if it is broken off, it is valid, even to validate all three of them which are broken on the top. And it finishes that Rabbi Yishmael retrated from the beginning of his words that he would require three Hadasim and validates even two which are broken off at the time. And this is the law if they did not bring them at all that they are broken off, according to the one who does not hold like this.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Sukkah
Introduction
In this mishnah the sages debate how many of each of the species he must take.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Sukkah
אפילו שלשתן קטומין – for beauty is not required for the Hadas/myrtle. And the Halakha is according to Rabbi Tarfon.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Sukkah
Rabbi Ishmael says: three hadasim, two aravot, one lulav and one etrog, even if two [of the hadasim] have their tips broken off and [only] one is whole. According to Rabbi Ishmael, one takes three hadas branches, two branches of aravot, one lulav and one etrog. He probably derives these numbers midrashically from the verses. However, the hadasim need not all be perfect. Two of them may have their tips broken off, as long as the third one does not. The Talmud questions this addendum to Rabbi Ishmael, wondering if a hadas with its tip cut off is valid. If it is, then why must the third one have its tip intact, and if it is not, then why bring two invalid hadasim?
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Sukkah
Rabbi Tarfon says: even if all three have their tips broken off. Rabbi Tarfon agrees with Rabbi Ishmael regarding the numbers of each species that must be brought, but he disagrees concerning the tips of the hadasim. He holds that a lulav with its tip broken off is valid.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Sukkah
Rabbi Akiva says: just as there is one lulav and one etrog, so too only one hadas and one aravah. Rabbi Akiva disagrees with Rabbi Ishmael concerning the number of each species. According to Rabbi Akiva one must only bring one of each species. The accepted halakhah with regard to the number of each species is according to Rabbi Ishmael.
