(Wenn er sagte :) "Dies ist dein Ziel, wenn ich erst nach dreißig Tagen komme", und er ging von Jehuda nach Galil —Wenn er Antipatras erreicht und zurückkehrt, ist sein Zustand ungültig. [Die Gemara erklärt diese Mischna als einen Fall, in dem er zwei Bedingungen stellt: 1) Wenn ich zum Galil komme, soll es sofort ein Get sein; 2) wenn ich nicht nach Galil komme—Wenn ich nicht vor dreißig Tagen zurückkomme, ist es ein Gewinn. wenn nicht, ist es nicht zu bekommen. Wenn er Antipatras, das Ende des Landes Juda, erreichte und innerhalb von dreißig Tagen zurückkehrte, ist das Get nichtig. Denn er erreichte das Galil nicht und verweilte nicht dreißig Tage.] (Wenn er sagte :) "Dies ist dein Gewinn, wenn ich erst nach dreißig Tagen komme", und er ging vom Galil nach Jehuda—Wenn er Kfar Otnai [am Ende der Grenze zu Galil] erreicht und zurückkehrt, ist sein Zustand ungültig. (Wenn er sagte :) "Das ist dein Gewinn, wenn ich erst ab dreißig Tage komme", und er ging ins Ausland— Wenn er Acco [am Ende der Grenze von Eretz Israel] erreichte und [innerhalb von dreißig Tagen] zurückkehrte, ist sein Zustand ungültig, [denn er ging nicht ins Ausland und verweilte nicht dreißig Tage.] (Wenn er sagte :) "Das bekommst du, wenn ich dreißig Tage gehe, ohne dein Gesicht zu sehen." — wenn er ging und kam, ging und kam [danach —Wenn dreißig Tage vergangen sind, ohne dass er ihr Gesicht gesehen hat, ist es ein Erfolg. Und wir sagen nicht, dass, da er am Anfang kam und ging, Grund zu der Annahme besteht, dass er eine Versöhnung bewirkt und das Erhalten für ungültig erklärt haben könnte, denn] da er nicht mit ihr zusammen war [in der Zeit, als er kam und ging, wir ahne nicht, dass er eine Versöhnung bewirkt haben könnte, und wenn die Bedingung erfüllt ist und er dreißig Tage geht, ohne ihr Gesicht zu sehen, ist es ein Erfolg. [Die Gemara erklärt, dass er zum Zeitpunkt der Erkrankung sagt: "Mit diesem Verständnis gebe ich ihr die Chance— dass sie von mir als hundert Zeugen geglaubt wird, wenn sie sagt, dass ich nicht gekommen bin und mit ihr zusammen geblieben bin und eine Versöhnung bewirkt habe. "Und dies ist die Halacha. Denn wenn er dies zum Zeitpunkt der Krankheit nicht gesagt hat, wir befürchten, dass er kommen und protestieren und sagen könnte, dass er eine Versöhnung bewirkt hat.]
Bartenura on Mishnah Gittin
הגיע לאנטיפטרס – The Gemara explains this Mishnah, such as two conditions were made: either I reach the Galilee, immediately it is a Jewish bill of divorce or if I do not reach the Galilee if we delay for thirty days and I do not come, it is a Jewish bill of divorce (i.e., it takes effect), and if not, it is not a Jewish bill of divorce (i.e., it does not take effect). If he went and arrived at Antipras which is at the end of the land of Judea and returned prior to thirty days, the Jewish bill of divorce is nullified, for he did not arrive in the Galilee and did not stay there for thirty days. And similarly if…
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Gittin
IntroductionIn this mishnah a man conditions the validity of his get upon his arrival at a certain place or lack of return within thirty days. The idea would be that if he arrived at his destination and did not return, he either was never intending on returning or something else had occurred to him, preventing his return and thereby validating the get.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Gittin
היה הולך מגליל ליהודה והגיע לכפר עותנאי – which is at the edge of the border of the Galilee, for he did not go abroad nor did he stay there for thirty days.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Gittin
[If a husband says,] "This is your get if I do not return within thirty days", and he was going from Judea to Galilee, if he got as far as Antipatras and then returned, his condition is broken. [If he says,] "This is your get if I do not return within thirty days", and he was going from Galilee to Judea, if he got as far as Kefar Otnai and then returned, the condition is broken. [If he said,] "This is your get if I do not return within thirty days", and he was going into foreign parts, if he got as far as Acco and then returned his condition is broken. All three of these sections have identical structures, so we will explain them together. According to the Talmud explains that in each case the husband made two conditions: 1) if he were to arrive at his destination the get would become effective immediately; 2) if he did not return within thirty days the get would come into effect. [I should note that there are other explanations of this mishnah, and its language is actually quite difficult and open to various interpretations.] In all three scenarios, he does not arrive at his destination and he returns within thirty days. Antipatras is on the border between Judea and the Galilee, but it is still in Judea. Kefar Otnai is still in the Galilee. Acco, while almost being considered outside the land of Israel (however, compare Gittin 1:2).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Gittin
[If he said,] "This is your get as long as I shall keep away from you for thirty days", even though he came and went and came and went, since he was not secluded with her, the get is valid. In this case, the husband conditions the validity of the get upon his staying away from his wifes presence for thirty days. The mishnah teaches that his intention was that he should not be secluded with his wife for thirty days. Therefore, even if he comes and goes but they are not secluded together, she is divorced.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Gittin
כל זמן שאעבור מנגד פניך ל' יום – By my staying there thirty days, I have been out of your sight, then it will be a Jewish bill of divorce.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Gittin
והיה הולך ובא וכו' – And afterwards, when he will tarry there for thirty days, he will be out of her sight, and it will be a Jewish bill of divorce. But we do not say that since, from the beginning, he was coming and going, for we suspect lest he appeased a quarrel between them, and the Jewish bill of divorce was nullified, that in the aftermath, he did not cohabit with her at the time when he was coming and going , we do not suspect that perhaps he appeased [her], but when he fulfills his conditions and tarries for thirty days with him being out of her sight, it is a Jewish bill of divorce. And in the Gemara, it is maintained [that this refers to] when he says at the time of [making] the condition, “on the condition of this, I deliver the Jewish bill of divorce” – that she will be trustworthy to me like one-hundred witnesses as song as she says that I did not come and cohabit [with her] and that I appeased [her]. And such is the Halakha, for if he did not say this at the time of the condition, we suspect lest the husband will comeand raise a complaint and say that I appeased [her].
