Если кетуба вдовы была за два манах, и она продала (имущество от наследства) стоит один манах за два манах; или стоимость двух манах за один манах, она получила свое наследство. [Ибо мы говорим ей: «Это твоя потеря». И при стоимости в один манах за два манах, хотя она и набрала, она не может сказать: «Это моя выгода», потому что если кто-то отправляет своего посланника на рынок, чтобы торговать, и он покупает что-то дешевое, все принадлежит ему кто дал деньги. Отсюда мы узнаем только о том, что не имеет фиксированной цены, например, о земле, которая не будет продаваться по смете; иногда больше, иногда меньше. Но если у чего-то есть фиксированная цена, и посланник купил это за меньшую цену, решение не ясно из (что мы узнаем) здесь. Я обнаружил, что раввины расходятся во мнениях по этому вопросу, и мне кажется, что (в таком случае) посланник и отправитель разделяются.] Если бы ее кетуба была маном, и она продала стоимость маны и динара за Мана, ее продажа недействительна. [Потому что ей не разрешили продать этот динар, так что вся продажа «по ошибке», вся продажа состоялась за один раз.] Даже если она скажет: я верну динар наследникам, ее продажа недействительным. Р. Шимон б. Гамлиэль говорит: ее продажа всегда действительна [и она возвращает динар наследникам. За что она их потеряла?]—если не будет [такой большой перегрузки], что [в отсутствие этой перезарядки] останется на поле девять кав [размер поля] и в саду - пол кава [размер сада. И, по словам Р. Акивы, четверть кав. [Галаха не соответствует Р. Шимону б. Гамлиэль.] Если бы ее кетуба составляла четыреста зуз, и она продала каждому (из трех покупателей стоимость маны) за ману; и, наконец, значение маны и динара для маны— последний (продажа) недействителен, а все остальные действительны.
Bartenura on Mishnah Ketubot
שוה מאתים במנה נתקבלה כתובתה – for we tell her “you have suffered loss/ruin and that which is worth a Maneh [that was sold] for two hundred, even though it gained in value, one cannot say: “I will make a profit for a person who sends his agent to the market to do business and he purchased it cheaply, everything goes to the owner of the money and we don’t hear from here other than regarding a thing that has no limit such as the case of land whose manner is for it to be sold through mere sight/estimate – this one for less and that one for more, but a thing that has a limit and the agent purchased it for less, the law is not made clear to us from this and becomes fit for something remarkable for they argued about it and the conclusion is according to [what] appears to us that the agent and the person sending the agent are arguing about.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Ketubot
Introduction
This mishnah deals with a widow who when selling her field either overestimates or underestimates the value of the field. The questions are, 1) is she deemed to have received her ketubah; 2) is the sale valid.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Ketubot
מכרה בטל – that same Denar, she does not have permission to sell, it is found that the entire sale is in error, for it took place at one time.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Ketubot
If a widow whose ketubah was two hundred zuz sold [land] worth a maneh for two hundred zuz or [land] worth two hundred zuz for one maneh, she has received her ketubah. There are two cases mentioned in this section. In both the widow is selling her husband’s land in order to collect her ketubah, which is worth 200 denar. In the first case she sells a field that was worth 100 zuz (a maneh) for 200 denar. Although her husband’s estate only lost land worth 100 zuz, since she received 200 denar, she has received her ketubah and does not receive anymore. In the second case, she sells land worth 200 zuz for 100 zuz. Since her husband’s estate sold off a field worth 200 zuz, it has paid off her ketubah, even though she only received 100. In other words, the husband’s estate always gets the benefit of the doubt.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Ketubot
לעולם מכרה קיים – and she should return the Denar to the inheritors for what loss did she cause them? Until it would be a fraudulent representation in order that if it were no overreaching, the field would remain worth nine Kabim which is the measure of the field,
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Ketubot
If her kethubah was one maneh, and she sold [land] worth a maneh and a denar’ for one maneh, her sale is void. Even if she says, “I will return the denar to the heirs”, her sale is void. Rabban Shimon ben Gamaliel says: her sale is always valid unless there was so much land there as to allow her to leave a field of nine kab, and from a garden an area of half a kab, or, according to Rabbi Akiba, a quarter of a kab. If she sells land worth more than her ketubah, the sale is invalid. This land is not hers and she only had permission to sell up to the value of her ketubah. Even if she says that she will pay back the extra denar to her husband’s inheritors, she is not allowed to do, if the inheritors want back their land. Rabbi Shimon disagrees and says that the sale is only nullified if the extra amount sold would have left the inheritors with a field in which nine kab of seed can be planted, about 3750 square amot (a little over 60 x 60 amot). If it was a garden of vegetables, the size is smaller, about 208 square amot or 104 square amot according to Rabbi Akiba. If the size of the extra land sold is smaller than this, the sale is valid.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Ketubot
and in the garden within one-half of Kab which is the measure of a garden. But the Halakha is not according to Rabban Shimon ben Gamaliel.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Ketubot
If her ketubah was four hundred zuz and she sold [land] to [three] persons, to each for one maneh, and to a fourth [she sold] what was worth a maneh and a denar for one maneh, [the sale] to the last person is void but [the sale] to all the others are valid. If her ketubah was 400 zuz, and she sold fields worth 100 to three different people and to the last person she sold a field worth 101, only the last sale is invalid. Each sale is considered on its own merits, and it was only the last sale which went over the limit.
