Mishnah
Mishnah

Talmud su Kelim 11:4

בַּרְזֶל טָמֵא שֶׁבְּלָלוֹ עִם בַּרְזֶל טָהוֹר, אִם רֹב מִן הַטָּמֵא, טָמֵא. וְאִם רֹב מִן הַטָּהוֹר, טָהוֹר. מֶחֱצָה לְמֶחֱצָה, טָמֵא. וְכֵן מִן הַחֲלָמָא וּמִן הַגְּלָלִים. קְלוֹסְטְרָא, טְמֵאָה. וּמְצֻפָּה, טְהוֹרָה. הַפִּין, וְהַפּוּרְנָה, טְמֵאִין. וְהַקְּלוֹסְטְרָא, רַבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ אוֹמֵר, שׁוֹמְטָהּ מִפֶּתַח זֶה וְתוֹלָהּ בַּחֲבֵרוֹ בְּשַׁבָּת. רַבִּי טַרְפוֹן אוֹמֵר, הֲרֵי הִיא לוֹ כְּכָל הַכֵּלִים, וּמִטַּלְטֶלֶת בֶּחָצֵר:

Ferro ritualmente impuro che fu fuso insieme a ferro puro: se la maggior parte proveniva dal ferro impuro, [la nave ricavata dalla miscela] è impura; se la maggior parte proveniva dal puro [ferro], [la nave è] pura. Se ognuno era la metà, è impuro. La stessa legge si applica anche a una miscela di cemento e sterco di bestiame. Un bullone della porta è suscettibile all'impurità, ma [uno di legno] che è coperto di metallo non è suscettibile all'impurità. La frizione e la traversa [di una serratura] sono suscettibili all'impurità. Un fulmine: il rabbino Yehoshua dice: può rimuoverlo da una porta e appenderlo su un'altra su Shabbat. Il rabbino Tarfon dice: è per lui come tutte le altre navi e può essere trasportato in un cortile.

Jerusalem Talmud Shabbat

There, we have stated21Mishnah Kelim 11:4.: “A door-bolt22Latin claustrum, n. “door bolt, bar”., Rebbi Joshua says one may slip it off one door and hang it on another on the Sabbath23R. Joshua only allows drawing the bolt out, tying it to a string and drawing it on the string to another door opening to the same courtyard, since this is moving “as on the back of one’s hand”, unprofessional, and not biblically forbidden. If the bolt can be drawn out without using a tool, it cannot be destroying a building and is not forbidden.. Rebbi Tarphon says, it is like any other implement and may be moved in the courtyard24He holds that a courtyard always is a domain by itself. It may not be part of the private domains of the houses opening into it; then without an eruv one may not carry from a house to the courtyard or from the courtyard to the house; but this does not limit one from carrying the bolt from one door to the next in the courtyard..” In the House of Rebbi Yannai they say, the Mishnah is about a courtyard without an eruv25Babli 124a.. If it is about a courtyard without an eruv, is that what we did state, “it is like any other implement and may be moved in the courtyard”26Since the door bolt was in the house, not in the courtyard, at the start of the Sabbath, the argument of R. Tarphon seems pointless since without an eruv no implement can be moved from the house to the courtyard.? Rebbi Yose in the name of Rebbi Jeremiah, Rebbi Ḥananiah reaches it in the name of Rebbi Eleazar: they formulated before implements were permitted. (If they formulated before implements were permitted,)27The text in parentheses is a mistaken correction by the corrector; it should be deleted. is that what we have stated: “it is like any other implement and may be moved in the courtyard”28The question raised (Note 26) has not been answered.? Like the29Tosephta 14:1 (ed. Liebermann), Babli 123b. It is asserted that there never was a rabbinic prohibition even in the days of Nehemiah which would have inhibited moving these implements in the courtyard, even from the house. “three implements which can be carried in a courtyard: a small knife, the chopper of fig cake, and the soup ladle30Greek ζωμήρυσις, -εως, ἡ..”
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Versetto precedenteCapitolo completoVersetto successivo