תלמוד על שבועות 4:17

HALAKHAH: “The two he-goats of the Day of Atonement,” etc. ⁸The following is a slightly changed verson of a text appearing in Sanhedrin 3:10 (Notes 150–162) and Ševuot 4:1 (Notes 7–17).He-goats⁹Lev. 16:5,7,8. Babli 62b, Sifra Aḥare Parasḥah 2(1)., the minimum of he-goats are two. If so, why does it say two? That they be equal.

Simeon bar Abba in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan: If he polluted himself during his son’s nezirut but was warned because of his own nezirut, he is whipped¹¹⁶Since a nazir is forbidden by biblical law to pollute himself with the impurity of the dead (Num. 6:6–7), if he pollutes himself intentionally and his criminal intent was ascertained because he was warned by two witnesses not to pollute himself and he did it anyway, he is punished in criminal law. In order to lead to prosecution, the warning must correctly state the law which might be broken.. If he dedicated his sacrifices, they are sanctified¹¹⁷In the Babli, 14a, in a different context, R. Joḥanan holds that his two neziriot are only one extended vow. There, it is disputed by R. Simeon ben Laqish.. One does not consider what Rebbi Ḥiyya stated: “His sacrifice to the Eternal for his nezirut,¹¹⁸Num. 6:21. Tosephta 2:6, Halakhah 3:2 (52c 1. 37), Šebuot 4:4 (35c 1. 58) {Num. rabba 10:42}. In the parallel sources, the statement is accepted as practice.” i. e., his vow of nazir should precede his sacrifice, rather than that his sacrifice precede his vow of nazir.

¹⁶⁶This section also has an almost identical copy in Ševuot 4:1. It is written¹⁶⁷Deut. 24:16.: Fathers shall not be killed because of sons. Is it not already written, each one should be killed for his own crime^167,Deut. 24:16.¹⁶⁸A slight misquote.? Why does the verse say, fathers shall not be killed because of sons? Fathers shall not be killed on the testimony of sons, and sons shall not be killed on testimony of fathers¹⁶⁹Babli 17b, Sifry Deut. 280.. From here^169aRead with Ševuot 4:1 מכן for מניין. that witnesses shall not be relatives of the accused.