תלמוד על ברכות 1:1
Jerusalem Talmud Sukkah
It was stated28Babli 51b, Tosephta 4:6.: “Rebbi Jehudah said, anybody who did not see the double stoa29Greek διπλη̅-στοά. of Alexandria did not ever see the glory of Israel. It was like a large basilica30Greek βασιλική, ‘η; Latin basilica. with a stoa inside a stoa. Sometime there were there twice as many as left Egypt. Seventy golden chairs were there, inlaid with precious stones and pearls, corresponding to the Seventy Elders; each of them costing 250’000 gold denars. A wooden platform was at the center and the congregation’s beadle stood on it. If one of the congregation came to read in the Torah the official waved cloths and they answered after him “amen”. For every benediction which he said, the official waved cloths and they answered after him “amen”. Nevertheless they were not sitting mixed but those of each single profession were sitting separately, so that a stranger could associate with those of his profession, and from there he could find support.” And who destroyed it? Trajanus the evil one.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jerusalem Talmud Yoma
HALAKHAH: Moonlight comes up as a beam; sunlight spreads over the entire East20The reason given in the Mishnah is difficult to accept. In the Babli 28b it is explained that it was a cloudy day where the moonlight also was diffuse.. So far if it was the end of the month; if it was the start21Even if one accepts the explanation of the Mishnah, the inquiry would only be necessary towards the end of the month when the moon rises towards morning.?
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jerusalem Talmud Challah
MISHNAH: Ḥallah and heave. 234Most of these rules have been spelled out for heave in Tractate Terumot; the sentence spells out that ḥallah is not only called “heave” (Num. 15:20–21) but actually follows all rules of heave. About them one is liable to death235Lev. 22:3. and a fifth236Terumot 6:1., they are forbidden to laymen237Lev. 22:10. Since this rule is mentioned after the penalties, it must mean that consumption by laymen of quantities too small to merit judicial attention is still forbidden., are Cohen’s property, can be lifted in 101238Terumot Chapter 5., need washing of the hands239An extension of the injunction Ex. 30:17–21. (and feet)240A scribal error in the ms. and some sources dependent on it; cf. The Mishnah with variant readings, Zera‘im II (Jerusalem 1975), p. 325, Note 74. and sundown241Lev. 22:7., are not taken from pure for impure242Terumot 2:1. but only from what is earmarked243Terumot 1:1, Note 6. and completed244Completely processed; Ma‘serot 1.. He who says, all my threshing floor is heave or all my dough is ḥallah did not say anything unless he left out a small amount.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy