משנה
משנה

פירוש על ערלה 1:3

Bartenura on Mishnah Orlah

אילן שנעקר – that the wind uprooted it or the river swept it away and brought it to another place.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Orlah

Introduction This mishnah discusses whether a replanted tree counts as if it was newly planted, such that one would have to wait another three years before its produce could be eaten.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Orlah

והסלע עמו – the dust/mud that is around the roots is called a clod, because it is made there as hard as a rock, and it states that if the if that dust/mud was with it and he added upon it dirt and it became rooted there in the land, we see if it (i.e., the fruit tree) can live from the dust/mud that comes with it without any other additional dust/mud [it is] like it is planted in its first place and it is exempt from Orlah, but if not, it is like a tree that grows on its own and is liable [for Orlah].
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Orlah

If a tree was uprooted and the hard soil together with it, or if a stream swept it away and the hard soil together with it, [then] if it could have lived it is exempt, But if [it could] not, it is subject. The criterion throughout the mishnah for determining whether the tree is considered to be replanted is whether it could have lived from the amount of soil that was uprooted with it. The test would seem to be placing it in a pot if there was enough soil still stuck to the roots of the tree that the tree could continue to live then it is exempt from the laws of orlah, meaning that this is not considered replanting. But if it could not live from this soil, then the clock is rewound and the fruit of next three years will be prohibited.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Orlah

זעזעתו המחרישה – the dust/mud is scattered and the roots are revealed.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Orlah

If the hard soil has been detached from its side, or if a ploughshare shook it, or if someone shook it, and one reset it with earth, [then] if it could have lived, it is exempt, But if not, it is subject. This same rule applies in situations where the tree lost some of its soil and then a person put more soil back there. If the tree could have lived off of the soil that was left attached to it, then putting new soil on it doesn’t count as replanting. But if it could not have lived off of this soil, then it does count as replanting.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
פסוק קודםפרק מלאפסוק הבא