Mishnah
Mishnah

Talmud for Shabbat 7:2

אֲבוֹת מְלָאכוֹת אַרְבָּעִים חָסֵר אֶחָת. הַזּוֹרֵעַ. וְהַחוֹרֵשׁ. וְהַקּוֹצֵר. וְהַמְעַמֵּר. הַדָּשׁ. וְהַזּוֹרֶה. הַבּוֹרֵר. הַטּוֹחֵן. וְהַמְרַקֵּד. וְהַלָּשׁ. וְהָאוֹפֶה. הַגּוֹזֵז אֶת הַצֶּמֶר. הַמְלַבְּנוֹ. וְהַמְנַפְּצוֹ. וְהַצּוֹבְעוֹ. וְהַטּוֹוֶה. וְהַמֵּסֵךְ. וְהָעוֹשֶׂה שְׁנֵי בָתֵּי נִירִין. וְהָאוֹרֵג שְׁנֵי חוּטִין. וְהַפּוֹצֵעַ שְׁנֵי חוּטִין. הַקּוֹשֵׁר. וְהַמַּתִּיר. וְהַתּוֹפֵר שְׁתֵּי תְפִירוֹת. הַקּוֹרֵעַ עַל מְנָת לִתְפֹּר שְׁתֵּי תְפִירוֹת. הַצָּד צְבִי. הַשּׁוֹחֲטוֹ. וְהַמַּפְשִׁיטוֹ. הַמּוֹלְחוֹ, וְהַמְעַבֵּד אֶת עוֹרוֹ. וְהַמּוֹחֲקוֹ. וְהַמְחַתְּכוֹ. הַכּוֹתֵב שְׁתֵּי אוֹתִיּוֹת. וְהַמּוֹחֵק עַל מְנָת לִכְתֹּב שְׁתֵּי אוֹתִיּוֹת. הַבּוֹנֶה. וְהַסּוֹתֵר. הַמְכַבֶּה. וְהַמַּבְעִיר. הַמַּכֶּה בַפַּטִּישׁ. הַמּוֹצִיא מֵרְשׁוּת לִרְשׁוּת. הֲרֵי אֵלּוּ אֲבוֹת מְלָאכוֹת אַרְבָּעִים חָסֵר אֶחָת:

The avoth melachoth are forty less one: sowing, plowing [the reason we are not taught "plowing" first, and then "sowing" in the normal order, is to be apprised that if the soil were hard, and he plowed and sowed and then plowed again, he is liable for the second plowing by reason of "plowing."], harvesting [One who harvests what has been sown and one who picks (the fruits of) trees is liable by reason of "harvesting."], piling [collecting plants that have been uprooted and piling them in one place], threshing, winnowing [with a winnowing shovel to the wind], separating [chaff with one's hands or with a sieve], grinding, sifting [with a sifter. Even though all of these have one end — to separate the unwanted matter from the food — because all of them obtained in the sanctuary, even though they are similar to one another, each is listed separately. Or, because they do not take place at the same time, but one after the other.], kneading, baking [This did not obtain in the sanctuary, baking obtaining only with a loaf, which does not relate to the work of the sanctuary. But our tanna lists the order (of labors in advance) of (baking) a loaf; and cooking, similar to baking, did obtain in the sanctuary with the dyes for blue, purple, and scarlet yarn. And one who stirs a pot or places a cover upon a pot standing on the fire transgresses by reason of "cooking." And all of the aforementioned labors of the Mishnah: sowing, harvesting, threshing, etc. — all obtained with (the preparation of) dyes for the work of the sanctuary.], shearing wool [ and all of its associated labors obtain with the blue wool in the work of the sanctuary], whitening it [i.e., cleaning it in the river], beating it [with a stick, or else, combing it with a comb], dyeing it, spinning, tightening (threads of the warp), making two loops [by passing two threads into a loop], dividing two threads [i.e., removing the threads of the woof from the warp, or the reverse, for weaving], tying and untying [The trappers of the chilazon, from which the blue dye was made, would tie and untie. For sometimes they would have to take strands from one net to attach to another, untying from the one and tying to the other], sewing two stitches [and tying them; for if he does not tie them, they do not hold. And he is liable twice, by reason of "tying" and by reason of "sewing."], tearing in order to sew [Tearing also obtained (in the sanctuary) with the curtains. For if a curtain became moth-eaten with a small round hole, it was necessary to tear the hole upwards and downwards so that the sewing not cause creases.], hunting a deer [All the work of its hide obtains (in the sanctuary) with the hides of the t'chashim], salting it, processing its hide [The gemara questions: Are not salting and processing the same? And it answers: Take out one and insert "tracing" (outlines for cutting on the hides), tracing being one of the avoth melachoth], rubbing it [scraping its hair], cutting it [trimming and cutting it for thongs and sandals], writing two letters, erasing in order to write two letters [This obtained in the sanctuary. They would mark the boards in order to match them, writing a letter on the one and on the other; and sometimes, they erred and erased them.], building, razing, extinguishing [the fire under the dye vat], lighting (that fire), striking with the hammer [upon completion of a labor. For an artisan strikes the anvil at the end of the labor. And there is liability for striking with the hammer only at the completion of a labor.], carrying from one domain to another. These are the avoth melachoth — forty less one. [The count in the beginning — "The avoth melachoth are forty less one" — even though each labor is mentioned individually, apprises us that even if one performed all the labors in the world on one Sabbath in one (period of) forgetfulness, it is impossible that he be liable for more than forty sin-offerings. For all of the other labors are toldoth of these avoth, so that he might have performed an av and its toldah, for which he would be liable for only one sin-offering.]

Jerusalem Talmud Shabbat

HALAKHAH: 25For this and the following paragraphs there exists a reasonably complete Genizah text (G) edited by L. Ginzberg (שרידי ירושלמי New York 1909 p. 62). A slightly garbled parallel is in Ševuot 1:1, explained there in Notes 5–20. The Notes here are restricted to references and short explanations.“Export on the Sabbath,” etc. What means “two which are four”? Two which are four for liability and two which are four for no liability, or four for liability and four for no liability? Let us hear from the following26Mishnah Ševuot 1:1.: “There are two kinds of oaths which are four kinds.” Rebbi Abba said, there all are about liability, but here we come to state both liability and no liability27For R. Abba, there is a difference between the Mishnaiot in Šabbat and Ševuot in that in the case here at least one person involved always is not liable whereas in Ševuot only one person is mentioned and all cases are of liability. For R. Yose, the parallel is only that of Mishnaiot 1–2, not 3–4. Each Mishnah describes two cases of liability; these are two covering in all four cases of liability as in Ševuot 1:1.. This implies four of liability and four of no liability. Rebbi Yose said, the Mishnah says so, “there are two kinds of oaths which are four kinds,” not because of liability? And similarly, “there are two kinds of export on the Sabbath which are four kinds,” because there is liability. But was it not stated28Mishnah Middot 4:1. The Mishnah is purely descriptive of the construction of Herod’s Temple; the notions of liability or no liability are inappropriate., “the doors of the Temple hall were two which are four?” Can you say, liability and no liability? Should we state twelve cases of no liability29There are four cases in the Mishnah where one party is liable and the other is not involved. Then there are four cases in which both parties are involved but nobody is criminally liable. One might construct another four cases where nobody is liable; e. g., if the poor man reaches into the house, picks something up, which the householder then takes from his hand and deposits outside.? We only come to state cases of no liability which correspond to cases of liability. Rebbi Ḥiyya bar Abba said, what is this “no liability” which we stated here? Permitted30Since in Mishnaiot 1–2 only one person acts, it is inappropriate to apply the label “not liable” to the other person. Babli 2b/3a.! Rebbi Yose said, the poor man and the rich man are one but the Sages counted them as two. Bringing in or taking out are one but the Sages counted them as two31In G, Ševuot 1:1, editio princeps, and a quote in RITBA Ševuot 1:1: “Taking out or bringing in are two but the Sages counted them as one.” As noted later in this paragraph, taking out is called work by Jeremiah (which cannot be used as a legal text but is confirmation of the interpretation of the law) whereas bringing in is only forbidden by the argument that taking out from A to B is bringing in to B from A.. Taking out on the Sabbath does not include bringing in; if one exports from one domain to the other, does this not include the one who imports? Let us hear from the following, as Rebbi Yasa said in the name if Rebbi Joḥanan: Somebody who brings in half the size of a dried fig and takes out half the size of a dried fig is liable32Even an intrinsic liability can be prosecuted only if a minimal amount was transported, which for food is determined as the size of a dried fig (Chapters 7–8). Since taking out and bringing in small quantities are to be combined, taking out and bringing in are representatives of one and the same action, viz., transporting.. And from where that taking out is called work? Rebbi Samuel bar Naḥman in the name of Rebbi Jonathan33In Ševuot 1:1 and the Babli (6b): R. Joḥanan; quoted without attribution by R. Ḥananel Šabbat 3b; in a number of Medieval sources R. Jonathan. understood it from the following34Ex. 36:6. Babli 96a.: Moses ordered, they made a public proclamation in the camp as follows, men or women should no longer do work to contribute to the sanctuary. The people refrained from taking objects out from their houses to give them to the collectors. Rebbi Ḥizqiah35Missing in Ševuot. In G, R, Aḥa in the name or R. Ila; in Sefer Haˋittim (ed. Mekize Nirdamim p. 300) R. Aḥa in the name of R. Ḥiyya. In Sefer Miṣwot Gadol #65, (part 1, fol. 17a in Venice edition) R. Ḥiyya in the name of R. Aḥa. in the name of Rebbi Ila: You even understand bringing in from this. Just as the people refrained from taking objects out of their houses to give to the collectors so the collectors did not accept anything from them to bring into the office. Rebbi Ḥizqiah in the name of Rebbi Aḥa understood everything from the following36Jer. 17:22.: do not bring out any load from your houses on the Sabbath day, and perform no work.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse