Talmud for Nazir 8:3

HALAKHAH: ⁵⁶This Halakhah also appears as Ḥagigah2:3 (ח). The House of Shammai say, irregular leaning-on was permitted. But the House of Hillel say, irregular leaning-on was not permitted. What is irregular leaning-on? From the day before. Rebbi Ze`ira said, everybody agrees that he did not fulfill his obligation regarding the reparation offering of a sufferer from skin disease if he leaned on the day before⁵⁷While the ritual of rehabilitating the healed sufferer from skin disease nowhere explicitly requires leaning on the sacrifice, it is written there (Lev. 14:13) that “the reparation sacrifice follows the rules of the purification sacrifice”, and for the latter (Lev. 4) it is written repeatedly “he leans-on and he slaughters”, implying first that leaning on is required and second that the two actions have to be close in time.; he fulfilled his obligation with voluntary well-being offerings for which he leaned on the day before⁵⁸Since these are sacrifices in satisfaction of a voluntary vow, no fixed time table is given here.. Where do they disagree? The festival well-being offerings⁵⁹These are religious obligations, not voluntary vows. As well-being offerings they have no fixed time table (but they cannot be brought before the holiday), as obligatory offerings at fixed times, on the holidays of pilgrimage, they are more like the offering of the healed sufferer from skin disease whose sacrifice is required on the eighth day of his procedure.. The House of Shammai treat them like voluntary well-being offerings; the House of Hillel treat them like the reparation offering of a sufferer from skin disease. Rebbi Yasa said, that what you are saying, he did not fulfill his obligation regarding the reparation offering of a sufferer from skin disease if he leaned on the day before, {only} on time. If its time has passed it becomes like voluntary well-being offerings⁶⁰If the eighth day has passed, the sacrifice can be brought at any time. This emphasizes that the essential point in the disagreement is the role of the fixed time frame for the festival offerings..

“If he injured one and then injured the other, or cursed one and then cursed the other, he cannot be prosecuted.”¹⁷⁰Tosephta 12:7; Babli 101a, Makkot 16a, Ḥulin 82b, 91a. Rebbi Ḥanania asked, does that not disagree with Rebbi Joḥanan? Since they disagree about the second day of holidays in the diaspora. Rebbi Joḥanan said, one accepts forwarning in a case of doubt, Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish said, one does not accept forwarning in a case of doubt¹⁷¹The argument is presented in detail in Pesaḥim 5:4 (fol. 32c), Nazir 8:1 (fol. 57a); derived from the point of view of R. Jehudah in Babli Makkot 16a.. Rebbi Ḥanina said in the name of Rebbi, there is no disagreement. There, it would have been possible to make a determination, here it is impossible to make the determination.