Mishnah
Mishnah

Talmud for Eruvin 1:10

מַקִּיפִין בְּקָנִים, וּבִלְבַד שֶׁלֹּא יְהֵא בֵין קָנֶה לַחֲבֵרוֹ שְׁלֹשָׁה טְפָחִים. בְּשַׁיָּרָא דִבְּרוּ, דִּבְרֵי רַבִּי יְהוּדָה. וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים, לֹא דִבְּרוּ בְשַׁיָּרָא אֶלָּא בַהֹוֶה. כָּל מְחִצָּה שֶׁאֵינָהּ שֶׁל שְׁתִי וְשֶׁל עֵרֶב, אֵינָהּ מְחִצָּה, דִּבְרֵי רַבִּי יוֹסֵי בַּר רַבִּי יְהוּדָה. וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים, אֶחָד מִשְּׁנֵי דְבָרִים. אַרְבָּעָה דְבָרִים פָּטְרוּ בַמַּחֲנֶה, מְבִיאִין עֵצִים מִכָּל מָקוֹם, וּפְטוּרִים מֵרְחִיצַת יָדַיִם, וּמִדְּמַאי, וּמִלְּעָרֵב:

They may fence it with reeds [stuck in the ground and standing straight (a perpendicular partition; that of ropes, being a horizontal one)], so long as there not be more than three tefachim between one reed and the next. This was stated in respect to a caravan. [They were lenient with them, requiring either a perpendicular arrangement, as with reeds, or a horizontal one, as with ropes; but they were not lenient with an individual, requiring both perpendicular and horizontal. (Three men are considered a "caravan.")] These are the words of R. Yehudah. The sages said: They spoke of a "caravan" only as being the common instance, (but it is permitted even with an individual.) Any partition which is not (both) perpendicular and horizontal is no partition. These are the words of R. Yossi b. R. Yehudah. [R. Yossi b. R. Yehudah differs with his father, saying that even a caravan requires perpendicular and horizontal.] The difference between the first rabbis and the second: The first rabbis permitted it to an individual only in an instance like that of a caravan, i.e., when he is on the road and cannot make a regular partition, but not when he is in the settlement. And the second rabbis say: Either way (perpendicular or horizontal), whether for an individual or for many; whether on the road or in a settlement. And the halachah is in accordance with them. But one man or two who camped in the desert may not make a partition larger than beth sa'atayim, one hundred cubits in length by fifty in width, as per the tabernacle court. And three or more men constitute a "caravan," and they may make a large partition, even several mil, as may be required by them, their belongings, and their beasts, so long as there be no empty space larger than a beth sa'atayim in the partition. Those who go out to war [even a sanctioned war (milchemeth reshuth, as opposed to milchemeth mitzvah)] were exempt from four things: They may bring wood from anywhere, [with no concern over theft, even if it were cut and piled by the owners]; they are exempt from washing their hands [before a meal. (But they are required to wash after the meal, that washing having been prescribed by reason of Sodomite salt, which causes blindness. A risk (to life) is of greater stringency than a prohibition.)]; (they are exempt) from demai [They are not required to separate terumath ma'aser from demai (suspect produce), as when they bought produce from an am ha'aretz]; (and they are exempt) from making an eruv [an eruv of courts, such as from tent to tent within the camp surrounded by partitions; but they are required to make an eruv of (Sabbath) bounds.]

Jerusalem Talmud Sanhedrin

91A Hebrew version of most of the story is in Midrash Samuel (ed. Buber) 25. This Nabal92“Scoundrel”. But the name seems to be Arabic نبل “possessed of superior qualities, generous, noble.” was a descendant of Kelubai. Nabal said, nobody in Israel comes from a better family than I. That is what is written931S. 25:2.: A man from Maˋon had his business in Karmel; the man was exceedingly rich, a Kalebite, a descendant of Kelubai. David heard in the prairie that Nabal was shearing941S. 25:4.. Tell him, to life951S. 25:6.! For long life. Peace be with you, etc. Rebbi Justus from Sunem said, they formed a camp96This is a side remark; it is more explicit in Erubin 1, 19c l. 75. In v. 4, it is stated that David sent 10 men to Nabal; in v. 6 it is stated they encamped. He concludes that the legal definition of a camp (for the religious obligations in wartime) refers to a minimum of 10 men.. Nabal answered David’s servants971S. 25:10., etc. From where that in criminal trials the voting starts from the side? Samuel the Elder stated before Rebbi Aḥa: David told his men981S. 25:13. The argument is quoted in the Babli, 36a, in the name of R. Johanan. The verse explains that David told his men to gird their swords; he girded his sword last. This is read to mean that he first polled his men whether Nabal should be executed for the crime of lèse-majesty; he gave his vote last., etc. He flew at them991S. 25:14.. What means he flew at them? He made them fly with words100Rashi quotes this in his Commentary to the verse.. Now know this and consider what to do1011S. 25:17.. She fell in with them1021S. 25:20., she bared her thigh and they walked by its light103Since in v. 3 she is described as a radiant beauty.. She fell in with them, they all were recognizable104In the dark of the night.. [David] said, was it in vain that I watched1051S. 25:21., etc.? Pissing on a wall1061S. 25:22.; why does he refer to the dog pissing on a wall? Even with the dog I shall not have mercy. Abigail saw David1071S. 25:23., etc. She told him, my lord David, what did I do, what did my children do, what did my animals do? He answered her, because he insulted the kingdom of David. She asked him, are you a king? He told her, did not Samuel anoint me as king? She answered him, our Lord’s Saul‘s coin108Latin moneta. is still circulating. And I am your servant1091S. 25:25.; this proves that he asked her for sex110Since in each sentence she repeats that she only is his servant, she has to emphasize that she is not going to be his companion.. Immediately, she brought out her stains111Indicating that she was not available since she was menstruating, and treating him as a rabbi, competent to decide whether blood was menstrual or not (cf. Introduction to Tractate Niddah.) and showed him. He said, does one investigate stains in the night? She retorted, may your ears hear what your lips say! Stains one does not investigate in the night, does one judge capital cases in the night? He answered, his sentence was already passed in daytime. She retorted, may this not be פוּקָה for you1121S. 25:31..
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse