Mischna
Mischna

Kommentar zu Shabbat 19:6

אֵלּוּ הֵן צִיצִין הַמְעַכְּבִין אֶת הַמִּילָה, בָּשָׂר הַחוֹפֶה אֶת רֹב הָעֲטָרָה. וְאֵינוֹ אוֹכֵל בַּתְּרוּמָה. וְאִם הָיָה בַעַל בָּשָׂר, מְתַקְּנוֹ מִפְּנֵי מַרְאִית הָעָיִן. מָל וְלֹא פָרַע אֶת הַמִּילָה, כְּאִלּוּ לֹא מָל:

Dies sind die Zitzin (Fleischstränge, die von der Vorhaut übrig bleiben), die (wenn sie übrig bleiben) Milah ungültig machen: Fleisch, das den größten Teil der Korona bedeckt. Und er (einer mit solchen Zitzin) isst keine Terumah [wenn er ein Cohein wäre. Denn einem unbeschnittenen Cohein ist es verboten, Terumah zu essen, was in Bezug auf das Pesach-Opfer (2. Mose 12,45) geschrieben steht: "Ein Reisender und ein Angestellter dürfen nicht davon essen" und in Bezug auf Terumah (3. Mose 22) : 10): "Der Reisende mit einem Cohein und sein angeheuerter Mann dürfen das Heilige nicht essen"—So wie das Pesach-Opfer jemandem verboten ist, der unbeschnitten ist, so ist Terumah.] Und wenn er fett wäre [so dass das Organ nach dem Entfernen der gesamten Vorhaut immer noch von Fleisch bedeckt zu sein scheint], wird es korrigiert [ dh die Dicke wird mit dem Messer] aufgrund von "Erscheinungen" [dh, so dass er nicht den Anschein hat, unbeschnitten zu sein] verringert. Wenn er beschnitten wurde, aber die Milah nicht freigelegt wurden (durch Herunterziehen der Membran), wurde es ist, als wäre er nicht beschnitten worden [und er muss zurückgehen und es bloßstellen, selbst wenn er sich zurückgezogen hätte. Und solange er am Schabbat beschnitten ist, schneidet er sowohl die Zitzin, die Milah ungültig machen, als auch die, die dies nicht tun. Nachdem er sich zurückgezogen hat, kehrt er zurück, weil er Zitzin ungültig gemacht hat, aber nicht, weil er Zitzin nicht ungültig gemacht hat.]

Bartenura on Mishnah Shabbat

ציצין –hidden shreds of flesh that remain from the foreskin.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Shabbat

Introduction This mishnah talks about some of the physical aspects of circumcision.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Shabbat

עטרה – it is a tall rim which surrounds the membrum virile round about and from it slants and descends to its head and the skin that covers most of the corona of the membrum virile as our Mishnah teaches , one should not say most of the coagulation, but even most of its height in one location.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Shabbat

These are the shreds which invalidate circumcision: flesh that covers the greater part of the corona; and he may not eat terumah. If there are little pieces of skin left after the foreskin was circumcised, they must be removed if they cover the greater part of the corona. If they are not removed the child is not considered circumcised and if he is a priest, he may not eat terumah, just as any non-circumcised priest may not eat terumah.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Shabbat

אינו אוכל בתרומה – if he is a Kohen, for an uncircumcised Kohen is prohibited to eat the priest’s due/Terumah. It is said regarding the Passover sacrifice (Exodus 12:45): “No bound or hired laborer shall eat of it,” and it is stated regarding Terumah (Leviticus 22:10): “No bound or hired laborer of a priest shall eat of the sacred donations.” Just as the Passover offering is prohibited to someone uncircumcised, so too the Terumah is prohibited to someone uncircumcised.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Shabbat

And if he is chubby, he must repair it for appearance sake. If the circumcision was done correctly, but due to the child’s chubby appearance it looks as if he was not circumcised, the mohel should repair the circumcision so that it looks like he was circumcised. Otherwise people will say that the child was not circumcised.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Shabbat

ואם היה בעל בשר – if he was fat and flesh appeared that was above his uncircumcised membrum, after the foreskin was taken off completely, as if the flesh returned and covered the membrum virile.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Shabbat

If one circumcises but does not uncover the circumcision, it is as though he has not circumcised. As we learned in mishnah two, an essential part of the circumcision is the tearing of the membrane underneath the corona. If this is not done, the circumcision is invalid. Note, that other aspects of the circumcision are less essential, including the sucking. The mishnah does not say that if the mohel did not suck the wound, the circumcision is invalid. This left room for some authorities to say that we don’t need to suck the wound, or at least that it need not be sucked through direct mouth to mouth contact.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Shabbat

מתקנו – and he slants the cutting utensil/knife from that thickness [of the fat].
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Shabbat

מפני מראית העין – so that he would not appear as uncircumcised.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Shabbat

ולא פרע – and he did not reveal it.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Shabbat

כאלו לא מל – and he would go back and split the membrane and pull it down and even if he removed his hand from it – for all the while that he is engaged in the circumcision on the Sabbath, he cuts whether the remaining shreds invalidate the act by omission or whether they don’t invalidate the act by omission after he removes his hand from the shreds which invalidate the act, he returns to the shreds which do not invalidate the act and he doesn’t go back.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Vorheriger VersGanzes KapitelNächster Vers