Comentário sobre Baba Metzia 9:2
הַמְקַבֵּל שָׂדֶה מֵחֲבֵרוֹ, וְהִיא בֵית הַשְּׁלָחִין אוֹ בֵית הָאִילָן, יָבַשׁ הַמַּעְיָן וְנִקְצַץ הָאִילָן, אֵינוֹ מְנַכֶּה לוֹ מִן חֲכוֹרוֹ. אִם אָמַר לוֹ חֲכֹר לִי שְׂדֵה בֵית הַשְּׁלָחִין זֶה אוֹ שְׂדֵה בֵית הָאִילָן זֶה, יָבַשׁ הַמַּעְיָן וְנִקְצַץ הָאִילָן, מְנַכֶּה לוֹ מִן חֲכוֹרוֹ:
Se alguém recebesse um campo de seu vizinho e este fosse beth hashlachin [terra seca, sem chuva suficiente (e, portanto, irrigada)] ou um campo de árvores [e "amado" do inquilino-agricultor em virtude da árvore , sendo capaz de compartilhar os frutos sem esforço] —Se o poço [do qual o campo foi irrigado] secou, ou a árvore foi cortada, isso não reduz o seu aluguel [se ele recebeu o campo no aluguel, tantos e tantos korin por ano; pois no começo ele não indicou que estava adicionando ao aluguel por causa do poço ou do campo.] Se ele (o locatário) dissesse a ele (o proprietário): Alugue-me este campo beth hashlachin ou este campo de árvore— Se o poço secou ou a árvore foi cortada, seu aluguel é reduzido, [o locatário indicou que estava adicionando ao aluguel por causa do poço].
Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Metzia
English Explanation of Mishnah Bava Metzia
But if he had said, “Lease me this irrigated field, or this field with trees”, and the spring dried up or the trees were cut down, he may give less than the prescribed rental.
In the scenario in this mishnah a sharecropper receives a field from the owner, and the field contains either a spring (an irrigated field) or it has some trees in it. Evidently the sharecropper will be growing grain in the field, but as an added bonus it has a spring, from which he can more easily water the field, or trees from which he may eat. After he makes his agreement with the owner, the spring dries up or the trees are cut down (assumedly by someone either than owner or the sharecropper). If the sharecropper had not explicitly stated that he was renting the field since it had on it a spring or some trees, he must still give the owner of the field the same amount of grain that was stated in the original agreement. Although the sharecropper will have to work harder to water the field (if the field had a spring) or he will lose the added benefit of the trees (if it was a field with trees), since he did not specifically stipulate that he was renting the field on account of the spring or the trees, the agreement is not effected. If, however, he specifically stipulated that he was renting a field with a spring or trees, he may reduce his payments if the spring dries up or the trees are cut down.