Mishná
Mishná

Comentario sobre Tevul Yom 3:6

טָהוֹר שֶׁנָּגַס מִן הָאֹכֶל וְנָפַל עַל בְּגָדָיו וְעַל כִּכָּר שֶׁל תְּרוּמָה, טָהוֹר. הָיָה אוֹכֵל זֵיתִים פְּצוּעִים וּתְמָרִים רְטֻבּוֹת, כֹּל שֶׁהוּא רוֹצֶה לָמֹץ אֶת גַּרְעִינָתוֹ וְנָפַל עַל בְּגָדָיו וְעַל כִּכָּר שֶׁל תְּרוּמָה, טָמֵא. הָיָה אוֹכֵל זֵיתִים נְגוּבִין וּתְמָרִים יְבֵשׁוֹת, כֹּל שֶׁאֵינוֹ רוֹצֶה לָמֹץ אֶת גַּרְעִינָתוֹ וְנָפַל עַל בְּגָדָיו וְעַל כִּכָּר שֶׁל תְּרוּמָה, טָהוֹר. אֶחָד טָהוֹר וְאֶחָד טְבוּל יוֹם, כָּאֵלּוּ. רַבִּי מֵאִיר אוֹמֵר, אֵלּוּ וָאֵלּוּ טְמֵאִין בִּטְבוּל יוֹם, שֶׁמַּשְׁקִין שֶׁל טָמֵא מַכְשִׁירִין לִרְצוֹנוֹ וְשֶׁלֹּא לִרְצוֹנוֹ. וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים, אֵין טְבוּל יוֹם טָמֵא:

Si una persona pura le dio un mordisco a un alimento y cayó [junto con su saliva] sobre su ropa y sobre un pan de terumah , es puro [es decir, el pan no ha sido preparado para la impureza]. Si uno estaba comiendo aceitunas partidas, o dátiles húmedos, siempre que quisiera chupar su hoyo, si caía sobre su ropa y sobre un pan de terumah , es impuro [es decir, el pan ha sido preparado para ser susceptible de ser impuro]. Si uno estaba comiendo aceitunas secas, o dátiles secos, siempre que no quisiera chupar su hoyo, si caía sobre su ropa y sobre una hogaza de terumah , es puro. Al igual que estos [casos, esta regla se aplica] con respecto tanto a una persona pura como a un tevul yom . El rabino Meir dice: estos y aquellos [es decir, ambos casos] son ​​impuros con respecto a un tevul yom , ya que los líquidos de una persona impura son importantes [cosas que pueden volverse impuras], ya sea de acuerdo con su deseo o no de acuerdo con su deseo. Y los Sabios dicen: un tevul yom no se considera una persona impura [es decir, y por lo tanto, sus líquidos no preparan la impureza contra su deseo].

Bartenura on Mishnah Tevul Yom

שנגס (break off, bite off - who took a bite of some food, and something mixed with his saliva fell on his garments) – he turned the food over in his mouth (i.e., chewing). It is the language of stirring the pot.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Tevul Yom

Introduction Today's mishnah deals with a person who is chewing food and the food falls out of his mouth. First it falls onto his clothes and then onto a terumah loaf of bread (and then my poor meatball, it rolled out the door!). The question is does the moisture on the food cause the loaf of terumah to be susceptible to impurity.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Tevul Yom

ונפל – the food [fell] with the moistness of the spittle that is upon it on his clothing and on the loaf of [bread of] heave-offering.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Tevul Yom

A clean person who chewed food and it fell on his garments and on a loaf of terumah, it [the loaf] is not susceptible to uncleanness. The person did not want this food to end up on his clothes. Therefore, this is considered a case of liquids that are "not to his liking." For liquid to make food susceptible to impurity it generally has to be that he wanted the liquids to come into contact with his food (see introduction to Makhshirin). We should note that the mishnah describes a terumah loaf even though the same halakhah is true even if the loaf is hullin. As far as liquid causing susceptibility to impurity, it makes no difference whether the food is terumah or hullin. The reason the mishnah mentions a terumah loaf is that in section four the tevul yom is discussed and a tevul yom disqualifies terumah.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Tevul Yom

טהור – the loaf, meaning to say it is not susceptible to receive ritual defilement. And even though mere spittle makes it susceptible. It is different here, for he did not consider to spit and it isn’t on purpose/intentional, for it fell upon his garments and it is obvious that it was not satisfactory to him.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Tevul Yom

If he ate crushed olives or moist dates, [or] if his intention was to suck out the pit, and it fell on his garments and on a loaf of terumah, it is susceptible to uncleanness. In this case he gathered up a lot of spit in his mouth in order to get the pit out of the olives or dates. Thus the spit was originally something he wanted. Even though later he didn't want the food to fall on his clothes, since originally he did want this spit, it causes the loaf to be susceptible.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Tevul Yom

כל שהוא רוצה למוץ את גרעינתו (anything on the pit of which he wishes to suck) - if he intended to suck the moisture that is on the pit and the pit/seed fell with the spittle that is upon it on the loaf of heave-offering, the loaf is made susceptible [to receive ritual uncleanness] with the spittle that is on the pit, and that is what he intended.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Tevul Yom

If he ate dried olives, or dried figs or it was not his intention to suck out the pit, and they fell on his garments and on a loaf of terumah, it is not susceptible to uncleanness. In this case, the dates or olives were dry and he didn't want to (or perhaps couldn't) suck out the pit. Since he didn't need the liquid of his own spittle it does not cause the loaf to be susceptible to impurity.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Tevul Yom

זיתים נגובים ומרים יבשות כל שאינו רוצה למוץ גרעינתו – he did not have an inappropriate intention regarding this liquid and it is not susceptible [to receive ritual defilement].
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Tevul Yom

This is the case irrespective of whether it was a clean person or a tevul yom [who was eating]. Rabbi Meir says: in either case it becomes susceptible to uncleanness in the case of a tevul yom, since liquids issuing from unclean persons render anything susceptible whether it was to his liking or not. But the sages say: a tevul yom is not regarded as an unclean person. According to the first opinion, the above halakhot are true even if the person was a tevul yom. A tevul yom is not treated as if he were impure as we see in the sages' response to Rabbi Meir. Rabbi Meir says that a tevul yom is considered like an impure person, and an impure person who causes liquids to come into contact with produce causes the produce to be susceptible (and impure) regardless of whether it was to his liking. This halakhah was taught in Makshirin 1:1. While this debate is about one particular and obscure case, we see here a broad dispute. Rabbi Meir holds that a tevul yom, a person who went to the mikveh but the sun has not yet set, is treated as if he was impure. The sages disagree.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Tevul Yom

אחד טהור ואחד טבול יום באלו – meaning to say that both of them are equivalent in this law.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Tevul Yom

טמאים בטבול יום – as he explains the reasoning, that liquids of an impure person make it susceptible and defile even unintentionally/not on purpose, and a person who had immersed himself that day/Tevul Yom is like an impure person with regard to this law. But the Rabbis consider the person who had immersed himself that day as ritually pure. And the Halakha is according to the Sages.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Versículo anteriorCapítulo completoVersículo siguiente