Dos testigos firman un documento simple, y tres obtienen un documento doblado. Si un get simple fue firmado por uno o un get doblado por dos, ambos son pasul. [Esta es la intención: así como una simple declaración firmada por un testigo es aprobada por la ley de la Torá, también lo es un doblado firmado por dos testigos.] Si estuviera escrito (en el get): "cien zuzin, que son veinte sela'in ", recibe solo veinte. [A pesar de que cien zuzin son veinticinco sela'in, el titular de la factura (de la deuda) tiene la mano inferior, que se interpreta: cien zuzin inferiores, que son solo veinte sela'in.] (Si fuera escrito :) "cien zuzin, que son treinta sela'in", él recibe solo cien (zuzin) [es decir, veinticinco sela'in, la factura está siendo interpretada: cien zuzin, que son treinta luz, sela inferior ', que valen veinticinco buenas.] (Si estuviera escrito :) "zuzin plateado, que son ...", y si [la cantidad siguiente] se borraron, recibe no menos de dos. "plata sela'in, que son ...", y se borró, recibe no menos de dos. "Darconoth, que son ...", y se borró, recibe no menos de dos. Si estuviera escrito arriba, "cien" y abajo, "doscientos", o arriba, "doscientos" y abajo, "cien", todo va de acuerdo con el inferior, [siempre que no esté escrito la última línea.] Si es así, [es decir, si se repite al final de la factura: "Y he asumido mi deuda por este y este monto"], ¿por qué se escribe la parte superior? De modo que si una letra se borrara de la parte inferior, podría derivarse de la parte superior.
Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Batra
פשוט שכתוב בו עד אחד – this is what he said: just as when a plain document in which only one witness is written in it is unfit from the Torah, so also a folded document in which only two witnesses are written in it is also unfit from the Torah.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Bava Batra
Introduction
Mishnah two mostly discusses discrepancies within a debt document.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Batra
אין לו אלא עשרים – and even though [it states] one-hundred zuzim, they are twenty-five Selaim. The hand of the owner of the document is at a disadvantage. And this is how we interpret for him a document: one hundred inferior Zuzim are not worth other than twenty Selaim.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Bava Batra
This mishnah deals with documents which were not done properly or had the amount of the debt partially erased.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Batra
אין לי אלא מנה – twenty five Selaim, this is how we interpret it for a document: One hundred Zuzim which are thirty light and inferior Selaim, which are twenty-five from the good ones.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Bava Batra
A simple document requires two witnesses; a sewn document requires three. If a simple document has only one witness, or a sewn document has only two, they are both invalid. A simple document must have two witnesses and a “sewn document” must have three. If they have fewer than the required amount the document is invalid.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Batra
ונמחקו – the number that is written afterwards is erased.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Bava Batra
If it was written in a debt document: “100 zuz which are 20 sela (=80”, he (the can claim only 20 sela; if [it was written] “100 zuz which are 30 sela (=120” he (the can claim only 100 zuz. If in a debt document (an IOU) a number was incorrectly converted into another coin (i.e. dollars into cents), the debtor owes the creditor only the lower amount.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Batra
ומלמטה מאתים – when he doubles his words in the document.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Bava Batra
[If there was written in a debt document] “Silver zuzim which are …”, and the rest was erased, [the creditor can claim] at least two zuzim. [If there was written in a debt document] “Silver selas which are …”, and the rest was erased, [the creditor can claim] at least two selas. [If there was written in a debt document] “Darics which are …”, and the rest was erased, [the creditor can claim] at least two darics. If a document said that the debtor owed a plural of a certain coin, but the number of the coins owed was erased the creditor can collect only two of the coin. Since the coin was written in plural (i.e. dollars), we know that the number was more than one. The minimum that it could have been is two, and this is what the creditor will be able to collect from the debtor.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Batra
הכל הולך אחר התחתון – as long as it will not be written last in the document.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Bava Batra
If at the top was written a “maneh (100” and at the bottom “200 zuz”, or “200 zuz” at the top and “maneh” at the bottom, everything goes according to the bottom amount. If so, why is the figure written at the top of the document? So that, if a letter of the lower figure was erased, they can learn from the upper figure. If the number at the bottom of a debt document disagrees with the number at the top, the creditor can collect according to the bottom figure, whether it is higher or lower than the bottom figure. The assumption is that the writer of the document, the debtor (or a scribe on his behalf) changed his mind after writing the first amount, and his true intention was the second amount. The mishnah then asks, why do we customarily write the amount on the top and not just on the bottom? The answer is that the top amount will help if the bottom amount is erased. If, however both amounts are still clearly written, we follow the bottom one.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Batra
למה כותבין את העליון – for since at the end, the document repeats and states it again, and the responsibility of this money such-and-such I accepted upon myself (see Talmud Bava Batra 167b).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Bava Batra
Questions for Further Thought: • Sections two and three: What is the principle that explains why in this case the debtor owes the lower amount (section two) or only two of the coin (section three)?
