א שְׁנֵי שְׂעִירֵי יוֹם הַכִּפּוּרִים, מִצְוָתָן שֶׁיִּהְיוּ שְׁנֵיהֶן שָׁוִין בְּמַרְאֶה וּבְקוֹמָה וּבְדָמִים וּבִלְקִיחָתָן כְּאֶחָד. וְאַף עַל פִּי שֶׁאֵינָן שָׁוִין, כְּשֵׁרִין. לָקַח אֶחָד הַיּוֹם וְאֶחָד לְמָחָר, כְּשֵׁרִין. מֵת אֶחָד מֵהֶן, אִם עַד שֶׁלֹּא הִגְרִיל מֵת, יִקַּח זוּג לַשֵּׁנִי. וְאִם מִשֶּׁהִגְרִיל מֵת, יָבִיא זוּג אַחֵר וְיַגְרִיל עֲלֵיהֶם בַּתְּחִלָּה, וְיֹאמַר, אִם שֶׁל שֵׁם מֵת, זֶה שֶׁעָלָה עָלָיו הַגּוֹרָל לַשֵּׁם יִתְקַיֵּם תַּחְתָּיו. וְאִם שֶׁל עֲזָאזֵל מֵת, זֶה שֶׁעָלָה עָלָיו הַגּוֹרָל לַעֲזָאזֵל יִתְקַיֵּם תַּחְתָּיו. וְהַשֵּׁנִי יִרְעֶה עַד שֶׁיִּסְתָּאֵב, וְיִמָּכֵר וְיִפְּלוּ דָמָיו לִנְדָבָה, שֶׁאֵין חַטַּאת צִבּוּר מֵתָה. רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר, תָּמוּת. וְעוֹד אָמַר רַבִּי יְהוּדָה, נִשְׁפַּךְ הַדָּם, יָמוּת הַמִּשְׁתַּלֵּחַ. מֵת הַמִּשְׁתַּלֵּחַ, יִשָּׁפֵךְ הַדָּם:
1 The two goats of Yom Kippur — it is their mitzvah that they be alike in appearance, in stature, in value, and in being taken at the same time. [("in appearance":) both white or both black. ("and in stature and in value":) For there are three verses in this regard, viz. (Leviticus 16:5): "And from the congregation of the children of Israel he shall take two goats," (Ibid. 7): "And he shall take the two goats," (Ibid. 8): "And Aaron shall place on the two goats." Since "goats" connotes two, why need it be repeated "two," "two" "two," three times? To teach us that they be alike in appearance, stature, and value.] But even if they are not alike, they are kasher. If he took one today and the other the next day, they are kasher. If one of them died — if it died before the lot had been cast, a mate is taken for the second; and if after the lot had been cast, a different pair is brought and the lot cast from the beginning. And he says (if the one "to the L rd" had died): "This one, for whom the lot came up 'to the L rd,' is in its place." And (if the one "to Azazel" had died): "This one, for whom the lot came up 'to Azazel,' is in its place." And the second one grazes until it sustains a blemish, and it is sold, and its monies go for gift (offerings). [If the one "to Azazel" died, so that now we have two "to the L rd," one that remained from the first pair and one from the second, atonement is made with one of them and the second one grazes. Similarly, if the one "to the L rd" died, so that now we have two "to Azazel," one of them is sent away and the second grazes. It is the second one of the second pair that grazes until it sustains a blemish, and the second of the first pair that is sacrificed if it is "to the L rd," or sent away if it is "to Azazel." For living animals are not "pushed away." And though they underwent a period of unfitness (when their mate died), this is subject to amendment by the provision of a new mate.] For a communal sin-offering is not caused to die (by not being fed). [For sin-offerings' being caused to die obtains only with individual sin-offerings; but the Yom Kippur goats are communal sin-offerings, viz. (Leviticus 16:5): "And from the congregation of Israel he shall take two goats for a sin-offering." (A "dead sin-offering" is one that is pent up in a house and kept there until it dies.)] R. Yehudah said: It is caused to die. And R. Yehudah said further: If the blood [of the goat "to the L rd"] spilled out, the sent-away goat is to die, [for the mitzvah of the (sprinkling of the) blood has not been performed. And, in respect to all the services performed in the white vestments, both inside and outside, "statute" is written, making them categorical requirements. He must, therefore, bring other blood, and this is impossible except through casting a (new) lot. And since R. Yehudah holds that living animals are "pushed away," the first sent-away goat is to die.] If the sent-away goat died, the blood is to be spilled out. [Even though, according to all, "sending away" is not a categorical requirement (i.e., the other services are valid even if it were not sent away), for "statute" connoting a categorical requirement is written in respect to what the priest does in the linen vestments and not in respect to what is done by the "appointed man" (with the sent-away goat), still, it (the above ruling) is derived from Scripture, viz. (Leviticus 16:10): "It shall be stood living before the L rd to make atonement over it." How long must the sent-away goat stand living? Until the time of the sprinkling of the blood of its mate — the implication being that if it died before that, the blood atonement does not obtain, for which reason it (the sprinkling of the blood) must be repeated. And this is impossible without casting a (new) lot; so two (new) goats are needed and the first is "pushed away." (For all agree that slaughtered animals are "pushed away")].