Reference for Pesachim 8:2

הָאוֹמֵר לְעַבְדּוֹ, צֵא וּשְׁחֹט עָלַי אֶת הַפֶּסַח, שָׁחַט גְּדִי, יֹאכַל. שָׁחַט טָלֶה, יֹאכַל. שָׁחַט גְּדִי וְטָלֶה, יֹאכַל מִן הָרִאשׁוֹן. שָׁכַח מָה אָמַר לוֹ רַבּוֹ, כֵּיצַד יַעֲשֶׂה, יִשְׁחַט טָלֶה וּגְדִי וְיֹאמַר, אִם גְּדִי אָמַר לִי רַבִּי, גְּדִי שֶׁלּוֹ וְטָלֶה שֶׁלִּי. וְאִם טָלֶה אָמַר לִי רַבִּי, הַטָּלֶה שֶׁלּוֹ וּגְדִי שֶׁלִּי. שָׁכַח רַבּוֹ מָה אָמַר לוֹ, שְׁנֵיהֶם יֵצְאוּ לְבֵית הַשְּׂרֵפָה, וּפְטוּרִין מִלַּעֲשׂוֹת פֶּסַח שֵׁנִי:

If one said to his bondsman: Go and slaughter the Pesach for me — if he slaughtered a kid, he [the master] may eat it [even though on all the other festivals he was accustomed to use a lamb. Since he did not specify, (it is assumed that) he relies upon him.]; if he slaughtered a lamb, he may eat it. If he slaughtered a kid and a lamb, he eats of the first [and he burns the second. The gemara construes this as applying only to king and queen — some say (that the rationale of their eating the first, etc. is) the fostering of peace in the kingdom; others, because they rely upon their bondsmen and are not particular as to whether they eat kids or lambs. Therefore, not being particular, they eat of the first, fulfilling the obligation therewith. But men in general, who are particular, may eat neither of the first nor of the second, the ruling being that one may not be numbered on two Pesachim at the same time to eat of whichever he likes. For there is no breirah (retroactive discrimination), so that when he wishes to eat of the one, we entertain the reservation that perhaps at the time of slaughtering he did not intend that one.] If he forgot what his master had told him [i.e., He told him "kid" or "lamb," but he forgot which], what does he do? He slaughters the lamb and the kid and says: "If my master said 'kid,' the kid is his and the lamb is mine; and if my master said 'lamb,' the lamb is his and the kid is mine." [The gemara construes this as an instance of one's having gone to a shepherd who was his master's familiar and who, desiring his (the master's) amendment, said to him (the servant): "If your master said 'kid,' the kid is his and the lamb is yours on condition that your master have no rights in it," in which instance the bondsman acquires it. For if not so, whatever the bondsman acquires is acquired by the master, so that both would be his master's.] If his master forgot what he had said to him, both (kid and lamb) are burned, and they (master and bondsman) have no Pesach sheni obligation. [For even though both are burned and not eaten because those numbered for them cannot be discriminated, still, the slaughtering and the sprinkling were valid, one (animal) for one; the other, for the other — as manifest to Heaven.]

Explore reference for Pesachim 8:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.